this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
30 points (89.5% liked)

Permacomputing

647 readers
2 users here now

Computing to support life on Earth

Computing in the age of climate crisis is often wasteful and adds nothing useful to our real life communities. Here we try to find out how to change that.

Definition and purpose of permacomputing: http://viznut.fi/files/texts-en/permacomputing.html

XMPP chat: https://movim.slrpnk.net/chat/lowtech%40chat.disroot.org/room

Sister community over at lemmy.sdf.org: !permacomputing@lemmy.sdf.org

There's also a wiki: https://permacomputing.net/

Website: http://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/permacomputing.html

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh it’s this time of the year again. I swear every year for the past 5 years I’ve read the same article about the return of dumb phones.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the year of the dumb phone, right after the year of the Linux desktop!

[–] pancakesyrupyum@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah but Valve might push Year of Linux into actually being a real thing.

The ship sailed on dumbphones a few years ago.

Yeah and they never actually returned.

[–] schmorpel 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Been thinking about it, but I think we're a bit past the point where it's even possible especially around banking. Maybe it would be important to have as many as possible go back to dumb phones before they start to introduce obligations to own a smartphone.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm a software developer. I have a modern phone. However, I just log into banking via the Web. I don't use any apps. So, I do so on my computer, but maybe my lifestyle doesn't require a phone to do this, and other people's do? I'm not sure. I just don't need to online bank when out and about. Is that a normal thing?

[–] activistPnk 1 points 1 year ago

Some banks in Europe are slowly removing features from their websites in attempt to push people onto their app which can execute whatever spyware they want without the constraints of javascript. Some banks have ditched their website and force their customers to use the closed-source app.. while also forcing them to buy new hardware periodically. Yes it’s a terrible direction things are going.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I think there are more advanced dumb phones that allow you to run android apps, so you could still have banking and whatnot, but then you'd risk of it becoming just another smartphone.

[–] activistPnk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A bank has already done that. If you don’t install their app, you simply lose access to your account. In Europe the post office banks will likely not pull that shit and will remain useful for analog/offline folks.

[–] schmorpel 3 points 1 year ago

I have been considering changing to my local farmer's credit bank. They still have actual places you can go in every small town. I drive 20km every time I want something from my actual bank, it's ridiculous. I imagine the farmers bank also might be analog-friendly in other ways.

[–] jeebus@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I am thinking of going back to a not Google or Apple data collecting experience. Looking at the light phone 2 and a librem 11 for when I need a browser.

[–] ProdigalFrog 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd recommend staying away from any Purism products. They've been doing some extremely shady and unethical stuff to people who've preordered their products. I always supported their mission of open-source Linux phones/tablets, but I've completely written them off as a company at this point.

[–] jeebus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks. That's too bad.

[–] activistPnk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed.

#Purism has a gitea repo which was open to the public. A repo was created to track all the under-handed & dodgy things #DuckDuckGo was caught up in, archive the evidence, and demonstrate how effective their illusion of privacy is on people to inform the public. It was also to establish rationale to suggest that Purism eliminate DDG as a default search. Purism simply deleted the repo and contributors accounts without warning out of the blue, without explanation. Assholes.

There are Google-free Android builds out there.

https://grapheneos.org/

https://divestos.org/

[–] activistPnk 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can’t get over my disgust in how the world threw all their perfectly good feature phones into landfills & now they’re buying new feature phones at absurd prices. WTF. Go to any flee market or street market and there are piles of old dumb phones. It’s like the people who are sensible enough to realize smart phones are a bad idea are still addicted to buying new stuff.

[–] elouboub@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So for people with no self-restraint?

[–] activistPnk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Certainly some people who lack self-control benefit from a feature phone.

I guess you probably got down voted because lack of self-control is only one of many reasons to use a dumb phone. The other reason mentioned in the article is battery life.

I have both a smart phone and a feature phone. The smartphone is permanently in airplane mode & it goes wherever I go. The feature phone actually has a mobile subscription but I don’t typically carry it.

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are like 12 of you who want this. It's not going to happen.

[–] Shalakushka@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not what I want, and thus no one wants it! Enjoy your obligatory surveillance state, non-tech bros!

[–] vic_rattlehead@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why don't they just uninstall the apps they don't want?