this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
318 points (84.6% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2992 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Informed Consent

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as three different religions all think important fiction occured in Jerusalem I don't think there will ever be peace in Israel. Does that mean a Palestinian state should not exist? No. It absolutely should and could.

[–] andrewrgross 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think this is widespread myth. This has been a heavily populated region for thousands of years, and most of them haven't looked like the last 70.

Also, I think we need to stop talking about Palestine should exist" and start working towards the one-state solution.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Tell the people building a wall to keep the other people caged off about a "one-state" solution.

You can argue "there are good/bad people on both sides" doesn't change that one segment of the population is being treated like a caged dog...

...And then we wonder why the dog bites the hand that feeds it.

[–] andrewrgross 11 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I'm not sure what your point is, but the One State Solution is the the preferred outcome of most Palestinian youth and most antizionists. Among everyone familiar with the issue on both sides, it's clear that the two state solution is dead, and only exists as an empty phrase to delay the only remaining option which would give Palestinians any civil rights.

https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/palestinian-youth-and-the-futility-of-the-two-state-solution/

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/middle-east/israel-palestine-one-state-solution

https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/the-case-for-the-one-state-solution/

[–] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's why Israel has been politically divided. The actions of the government don't reflect the populous as a whole. If we went by your logic, all Palestinians would be guilty of war crimes now. Which is as stupid as blaming everything on Israel. Or blaming all Arabs for the Yom Kippur war, and so on.

There's no innocent parties here. If it feels that way, you dont know your history. Judge by actions... condem the crimes of Israel, but don't let that dissuade you from the decrying the incredible war crimes of Hamas and its supporters the past few days.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Israel’s political divisions are no longer divisions over the Palestinian question. Both sides in the last election argued over which one would be tougher on Palestinians. Benny Gantz tried to claim he’d be tougher than Netanyahu because he’s killed Palestinians before. Neither wants Arab Israelis serving in the cabinet or government. The Israeli left wing has withered away over the last 20 years. Those massive street protests in Israel over Netanyahu gutting the courts was about Israelis, nobody brought up how this change would further harm Palestinians. Heck, the outrage was that Israelis would start to be treated “like Palestinians” under rightwing judges.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago (15 children)

The suggestion that if Israel simply lifted the blockade and stopped all security operations in the West Ban there would be complete peace is ridiculously idealistic and naive.

You are not going to convince a nation that just saw hundreds of citizens brutally murdered and kidnapped that the only thing they have to do is fully open the borders and smile, and then the people who just murdered them will come out and be their friends.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 104 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

The inverse is also true. Israel has kept these people bottled up in what amounts to open air concentration camps for the last 70 years, and constantly killing Palestinians for that entire time.

Israel has never cared about collateral damage in their war on the people who lived there before.

So imagine a people, treated like criminals for their entire lives, all because they lived on the land that Zionists wanted.

All that resentment for the unceasing oppression let the worst elements gain power.

The path to change is not to expect the oppressed to stop lashing out. Only in ending the oppression can there be change.

But the Israeli government isn't interested in stopping the oppression. They could have done that at any time in the last 70 years. No, they seem to want a full genocide.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

The reason that Israel doesn’t go full speed on genocide is the same reason why they never actually pursue peace. That is, the ruling authority there benefits from having a persistent threat. They get to maintain and build power and wealth while genociding in a slow enough fashion to not raise a critical mass of objections from their benefactors in the United States.

Not only the resentment but Israel actually helped their worst elements gain power in order to cause an inner conflict within the Palestinians. They supported Hamas's growth to cause a fissure between them and the PLO.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 41 points 1 year ago

This isn't that profound an observation, because the same sentiment works in reverse from the point of view of Palestine. There's no way that they can appease Israeli revanchism. That's why the situation is so intractable.

[–] andrewrgross 14 points 1 year ago

This is a ridiculous straw man.

[–] x86x87@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look up how many civilians were killed on both sides since the beginning of this clusterfuck.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know as well as I do that if Hamas was successful every time it tried to murder an Israeli, those death tolls would be much much closer.

Are you saying that if Israel let more of its civilians die, it would be less morally culpable?

[–] x86x87@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I cannot imagine success as killing someone. Also, you are speculating on what might happen with people's lives.

IMHO civilians dying in any circumstances is dumb af. This includes them directly dying as a result of war and indirectly dying as a result of economic and political maneuvers, blocades, shitty things.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cyd@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The two state solution isn't workable, because Israel will never allow a viable Palestinian state. The only three options are

  • genocide
  • a permanent state of apartheid
  • giving the Palestinians the vote and letting the political chips fall however they may

All three options have downsides, but in my view the third choice is the only one that's sustainable in the long run and not morally monstrous. But I have no confidence at all that that's the pathway that will be chosen.

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

What, pray you, is the nuanced downside to genocide?

Edit: lol I forgot the /s didn't think it was necessary. Your wording was funny to say there's a downside to all 3 like genocide is even an option

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Nobody left to feed the cats

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bad press. Gotta worry about stray kids getting all angry and coming at you years later. It’s a lot of work. But, they learned from ze Germans

Guaranteed the Israeli govt talks about it as a viable option, the blasé attitude of their soldiers when it comes to shooting children or anyone not Israeli is an example. They’re just as bad as the saudis, our money lets them have carte blanche for whatever the fuck they want to do

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No more Palestinian food. /s

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not promoting genocide. That's definitely a downside lol

[–] samson@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

People die.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

Looks like the author is suffering from amnesia.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Always so interesting when these things happen, every internet commenter is an expert on any complex situation.

load more comments
view more: next ›