this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
367 points (100.0% liked)

196

16238 readers
2049 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 65 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's pretty disrespectful to imply that ace people aren't fully human imo

[–] kotauskas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

asexual ≠ has no sex drive

[–] H_is_for_hedgehog@mander.xyz 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Asexual = no sexual attraction (I think)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It's.... complicated according to them.

As a bi man, I'm used to being erased and don't want to do it to the ace homies, but I have to admit when some of the crowd are going on about how they're "aroace with sexual impulses" I'm pretty tempted, because it sure sounds like they're saying they want minority status for hitting and quitting.

[–] businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 11 months ago

thank you for putting in the effort to even think about the ace homies lol. it was actually really refreshing to see it even brought up in this thread since it isn't talked about a lot!

from what i've read it can vary a lot from person to person, and it is a spectrum. in my experience i can compare it to aphantasia, where i haven't experienced this thing that many people consider central to their lives and those around them but it really hasn't affected me in a negative way that i can perceive. as i understand it, asexuality is purely the lack of sexual attraction, and theres plenty more words to further specify where people fall on the spectrum if you want to look it up.

i think a lot of the "iffy" ace identification/definition you can read about online simply comes from it being so hard to prove the absence of a thing, when the opposite can be so easy.

[–] SolarNialamide@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

So, I'm not completely ace, but I am 95% and seemingly get more ace every year that goes by. Thing is, there's a difference between sexual impulse and arousal on one hand and attraction to an actual person on the other. I get horny as hell every single month during my ovulation because my uterus is screaming and begging me to make babies, and that's usually when my once or twice a month masturbation happens. But the last time I met an actual real life person I was sexually attracted to was 4 years ago.

I can also find the idea of a person sexually arousing, but still won't find the actual person attractive. I know this from experience, because when I was much younger and didn't know myself as well I did act on the attraction to the idea of a person only to be sorely disappointed when it actually happened and I felt nothing.

This is only my own experience of course, but I hope this helps a bit in understanding it.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

If you don’t reproduce on your own, you’re not truly asexual. #mitosis

[–] Zimmy@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Jesus was a serial masterbator

[–] njinx@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The Catholic church isn't exactly the most LGBTQ-friendly organization

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

I feel like the ace theory makes the most sense imo

[–] DearAll@beehaw.org 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Asexual people are fully human though

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

not to catholics

[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 11 months ago

I was about to say asexual people, but catholics don't believe in those

[–] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Me, an asexual person: Fuck yeah I'm not fully human

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

happy adeptus mechanicus noises

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago

Probably ass: it’s well known that Christ broke up buns into fish to feed the crowd at the sermon on the mount - a subtle metaphor for cumming to the butt

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 22 points 11 months ago

I think Jesus was an eyes guy. He said eyes are the windows to the soul after all.

But then again he might have been a little bit into feet with all the feet washing and everything.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jesus was known to fraternize with sex workers, and I'm pretty sure someone a sex worker would willingly be friends with is someone who's either not interested or well and good capable enough of controlling themselves that it's not really the same discussion as it would be with others when talking about sexual temptation.

IIRC the story of Jesus experiencing temptation was one of him being tempted with power and/or being freed from some trial of suffering he had found himself in.

Some loveable himbos have the sex drive of an unfixed Chihuahua but still have attempts at seduction bounce right off them until the attempt is then redirected at bribing them with an especially delicious sandwich.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

A good sandwich gets me in the mood, what can I say

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

He had a big tiddy hooker gf, you can’t tell me Jesus didn’t have sexual temptations

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 11 months ago

Insert Robert Langdon speech about the Catholic smear campaigns of Mary.

...

I think Lemmy is an old enough crowd to get the reference, right?

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Correct answer: Boobs didn't exist until Eve so obviously ass. Boobs are just front facing asses after all.

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The obvious answer, especially for anyone who already believes multiple things can be true at the same time:

"Why not both?"

[–] overkill0485@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I need a Jesus Loves Bimbos sticker, stat.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

My impression is he was totally banging Mary Magdalene, and that just was just omitted. If he was like any other popular cult leader, he also got his pick of the young women among the followers.

It would have been regarded as peculiar and noticeable if Jesus didn't partake of the groupies.

[–] Anti_Weeb_Penguin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Maybe he had erectile dysfunction