Experts agree that powerful corporate and government authorities will expand the role of AI in people’s daily lives in useful ways.
No. No they do not agree on that!
- https://mstdn.social/@emilymbender@dair-community.social/109938046891893346
- https://ali-alkhatib.com/papers/chi/utopia/utopia.pdf
- https://www.danmcquillan.org/chatgpt.html
- https://davekarpf.substack.com/p/the-reverse-scooby-doo-theory-of
- https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/02/chatgpt_considered_harmful/
- https://michellerempelgarner.substack.com/p/is-it-time-to-hit-the-pause-button
The compulsion to show 'balance' by always referring to AI's alleged potential for good should be dropped by acknowledging that the social benefits are still speculative while the harms have been empirically demonstrated.
(from one of the links above)
Enough with the "experts agree AI is great" bullcrap already!