this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
167 points (81.3% liked)

Android

17658 readers
211 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SUMMARY

  • The EU has identified WhatsApp as a gatekeeper in the messaging industry and has given it a few months to enable interoperability with other apps.
  • The EU's Digital Markets Act aims to promote fair competition and give consumers more options for alternative services.
  • WhatsApp has already begun working on interoperability with other apps, potentially allowing smaller players like Signal to compete more fairly.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 112 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Signal will soon be your one stop solution for all your chat apps

Fixed that for you.

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] elouboub@kbin.social 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is this being presented as "whatsapp will be the one and only" instead of "whatsapp won't be the only option"? The DMA will users to install nearly any chat app and chat with users from another chat app.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id 56 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The fact that iMessage got the exemptions underpins the entire act. I would any day switch to Signal, if there is 1:1 interoperability b/w the platforms.

[–] Alonely0@mastodon.social 32 points 1 year ago

@TheMadnessKing @floppy in Europe for most people iMessage is just the SMS app. Even though it pisses me off that Apple got away with it, having WhatsApp to comply with this is just huge. Everyone here uses WhatsApp, and now I won't be forced to leave Signal anymore.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

iMessage is not considered a gatekeeper in Europe because pretty much nobody uses it. That's why it's extempted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple just claimed an exception. It's still up to the EU to determine whether it is actually exempt or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody here uses it though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

It's because there's not enough people in the EU actually using it.

It's really on American regulators to hold American companies accountable if they abuse their dominant position in the American market to the detriment of American consumers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kindenough@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago (7 children)

No it won't.

My sister was angered when I quit whatsapp (and facebook), asking me reasons why and if it was because I didn't like her. Told her I like my privacy. Haven't heard of her and a lot of other family since who only like to communicate through social media. Good.

I like SMS and Signal, only people that care for me are using that because I asked them to.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

I’m there with you on the ideals, after all here I am on Lemmy (and mastodon fwiw) with Reddit and TwitterX deleted.

But, everybody I am close to in everyday life is a normie for lack of a better term. I don’t have to use Facebook regularly, for example, but there is a practical value to just having it available and checking notifications from time to time.

Kind of like how I’m looking through some code in Linux at work today, but it’s running in a VM on my Microsoft/O365 equipped PC. Much like with Facebook, factors outside my control necessitate using it, so I accept it without stressing myself.

I’m not trying to argue or convince you to change your ways though! FLOSS and privacy need awareness and advocacy, and therefore need strong outspoken supporters!

only people that care for me are using that because I asked them to.

That logic works both ways. You don't care about them enough to use WhatsApp/Facebook it seems to me.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

WhatsApp can eat a crap

I won't use it either

[–] someone_secret@burggit.moe 11 points 1 year ago

Not to burst your bubble but SMS is even less secure than WhatsApp. In fact, SMS is among the least secure communication avenues on a phone, since your telecommunications provider has the ability to keep logs of what you send, when you send it and to whom you send it to.

Not to mention how insecure 4G is and how easy it is to intercept other people's messages

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Cool so I can decide to use Signal for privacy reasons and if the other party uses WhatsApp all my chats with them are read by Meta? What is the point?

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, it's still E2EE. Meta can't read it as far as anyone knows. Meta will know that the other person has you in their contacts (they already know this) and that they are messaging you, that's it.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Meta writes the software that runs on the other end, and it's closed source. Therefore for all we know, the message is end-to-end encrypted, and the moment it is decrypted on the other end Meta can send it back to their servers or use it for advertising. Unless the client at the end is open source and audited, E2E doesn't mean much imo

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 25 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I can't wait for signal/session/simplex to be whatsapp compatible, but I'm not sure they can provided the e2ee gurantees since whatsapp is closed source.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I fear that Signal won't implement cross compatibility for WhatsApp since they already said that they are not a fan of potentially giving up E2EE to get it to work. And I can understand that but I still really would like to have the cross compatibility.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I hope Signal doesn't if it won't be E2EE. I like knowing that if it's in Signal, it's E2EE, and being able to tell less technically sophisticated people to whom I recommend Signal that everything in it is secure against eavesdropping.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tomrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Signal and also lots of other privacy focused messenger-services (threema e.g.) already said the will not implement this forced interoperability since it will lower their already high standards regarding their users privacy. Sad but i guess it makes sense :(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

Not a fucking chance!

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

Odd way to spell Matrix.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Signal interoperability

I support it but this doesn't sound legit

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's weird. With every single app having a DM feature years before Whatsapp was even invented, with every single cell phone having email and SMS capabilities, and with a bunch of E2E encrypted apps already in service, why would I want to go back to Facebook's ecosystem in 2023?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

When every single person you know uses Whatsapp, you have to use it too. That's what this law is about. So you can use other apps even if everyone else uses whatsapp

[–] heird@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Whatsapp worked on iPhone, Android, Blackberry and even some old ass java phones

They dominated the market in most countries or were close second to Messenger.

Now they keep growing and it doesn't give any chance to smaller better apps, this law makes it possible for you to use only signal but also chat to people that only use Whatsapp

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Eww no get that trash outta here

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And this is where I wonder, how long until Matrix servers preemptively defederate from WhatsApp?

[–] jackoid@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Probably won't. WhatsApp is already huge. Threads was a new platform with artificially inflated user numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NorthWestWind@iusearchlinux.fyi 12 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I setup my own matrix instance and ran a few bridges on it, so I don't need WhatsApp thanks

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Nice try, WhatsApp.

[–] severien@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Does anyone know what level of interoperability is required? Like basic text, pictures, emoji... or every feature including things like location sharing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Fuck that, fuck them they belong in the digital bin. I don't want WhatsApp to be able to connect to Signal or anything else. Sounds like a gigantic security risk.

[–] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, fuuuuuck that. I use Signal for a reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I have a whatsapp because my dad wanted to be able to call me without international long distance fees. He's called once and I get endless amounts of spam. I'll be seeing him in a couple of weeks, and I can hopefully switch him to LINE (what everyone uses here) and get rid of this app for all and get the last cancer of Meta out of my personal life.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] QuantumEyetanglement@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Whoa this is bonkers! Would be great if all apps supported RCS as a fallback

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί