It's probably copyright infringement, so I'm in favor of it :)
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
It's usually covered under fair use doctrine in the United States, though there are limits. More specifically, it must be both transformative and noncommercial.
I used to think "bit pointless, but whatever makes people happy"
recently i realised the potential in recreational reimagining of things, if nothing else it might be a nice 'exercise' for our mind.
truth be told, most hollywood adaptations of a book are basically high budget fan fiction.
It can be fun to have a different take on characters. This is especially true for crossover fanfics or fixit fanfics in the case of source material with plot holes or other flaws.
I don't really bother with it myself, as I have enough trouble reading primary sources, but there is a huge community out there that is creating ongoing interest in various works and settings, and I have trouble seeing how that can be a bad thing.
I've been reading fanfiction for 13+ years now and I'm a huge fan. Here's to another 20 years!
It's free reading material that you can access from your phone anywhere. I love it!