this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
338 points (98.0% liked)

News

23200 readers
4287 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] athos77@kbin.social 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In her decision, Howell also accused Giuliani of destroying evidence relevant to the case.

Well, that's interesting. I wonder if he's destroyed evidence in any other cases he might be involved in. (That's rhetorical, btw - if he's done it here, then of course he's done it in the much more serious January 6th case.)

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I am deeply curious to know what prompted the judge to include that accusation. Such an accusation, without sufficient evidence to support it, could definitely (and ironically) be defamatory.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, who wouldn't? Most people don't commit crimes, which is of course the right way. But if you do, only idiots create any evidence in the first place, but only complete idiots leave that evidence around for law enforcement to find.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agreed. But most people were never the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, who specialized in taking down hard-to-get-at groups using RICO laws - someone who knows in exacting detail what those laws are and how they can be applied. He knew better than to leave evidence in the first place, and doubly knew that getting rid of it was an especially bad idea of the investigation was at all serious.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean he failed to comply with discovery subpoenas. To me that says that he was more concerned with what might turn up than he was with having to pay damages in this case. If he loses this but avoids larger legal cases because of it that may be shady but I wouldn't call it stupid.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

True. But Iirc (it's hard to keep track) he's an unnamed coconspirator in one of the federal cases, and I think destroying that evidence works more against him there.

He is obviously an idiot, because he's creating evidence left and right. With these people I think it's a mix of stupidity and hubris. They got away with so much crap, they think they'll get away with everything.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Howell's ruling against Giuliani was by a default judgment, as the judge found that he had failed to comply with a number of subpoenas, particularly those pertaining to the lawsuit's discovery phase.

Never go full Alex Jones, it never works out

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Alex Jones doesn't have a law degree. That's what makes this especially baffling. He didn't do the most basic thing you can do in a lawsuit.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder that the whole theory behind default judgements, is that the court has to assume you did it to hide something at least as bad as what you're accused of.

Or maybe he's just a senile wacko who's had his ego stroked way too much in his life. 9/11

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really am baffled. Even if he's senile, doesn't he have staff?

[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He's probably not able to pay them, so I guess they ain't particularly eager to do anything.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Remember that he's evil, not stupid, and he's capable of making decisions that serve his interests. If he just flat out defied a subpoena it's because the consequences of complying with the subpoena would have been worse.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Yep. He didn't comply with discovery. He is hiding something. I bet we find anyway soon.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Evil people who are not also stupid, don't hitch their wagons to Trump's star.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Wasnt until recently that became an objectively bad idea. I honestly think that if he didn't loudly and purposely fumble COVID we'd already have president-for-life Trump

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I think given the extent to which he has pickled his brain, Giuliani may well be stupid as well now.

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm surprised that for quite a while he was considered a legal genius, up to his mayoral stint. Was he always like this or has it been something related to age/hubris/lead poisoning?

[–] RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He was very much always like this. It's pretty well documented.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dunno. I saw a document about prosecutors and feds learning how to use rico when it was still new. He seemed really cogent in his interview. I think there might have been a time when he was pretty sharp. Now his mind is melted by age and ever-more-insane politics on the right. I think he’s also a well-known alcoholic, and not in the fun party way… the all the time way.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His eyes were very red in his mugshot. He was either very drunk or very hung over.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Why not both!

[–] flipht@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think that having cogent statements about a thing he was well prepared for is not mutually exclusive with being an addled idiot in other areas of his life.

He's had too much koolade and thought he could get away with more and more based on the force of his personality. We are watching it bite him in the ass in real time.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The right gave him attention and he capitalized on it.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He always had a bit of a nasty authoritarian streak, but he used to be a bit better at practicing law. Now he’s just flailing like a fool.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The long arm of ferret lovers finally moved to checkmate.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Ah. He used the Alex Jones defense strategy.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope he's disbarred. At minimum, Bill Barr should get a restraining order against him.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I hope that these people continue in their refusal to take the court seriously. It used to frustrate me, but I’ve realized that it’s much better than endless delaying tactics and other legal shenanigans.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

LOL, I am really enjoying the schadenfreude. It's gonna be hella funny when RICO Suave is imprisoned.