this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
418 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19594 readers
3702 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 day ago

I'm curious: doesn't a prez who repeatedly violates the constitution constitute grounds for impeachment?

Of course, his republican lapdogs would never agree to that. So even starting the process would be rather pointless...

[–] LibertyLizard 308 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

I think people are underestimating the seriousness of this action. He is effectively turning the civil service into his personal servants. Does congress even have a say in government anymore if this is allowed? Do the courts?

If Trump can effectively order government employees to do anything under threat of firing or worse, then is our situation meaningfully different from autocracy? This is an absolute emergency and I think people are not seeing the bigger picture here.

We need a plan to fight back against this, and I want to ask everyone to participate in whatever capacity they can. And please don’t give me any “ThE pLaN wAs VoTiNg” replies. We lost the election and we need to move on from this learned helplessness and figure out what comes next. We don’t have time to wait until the next election to fix this.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Sorry this is going to be harsh and i do apologize for that.

He is hitler2.0. this man is a fucking nazi in every way that matters.

Not just regular i didn't know how bad they were nazi, this dude literally owns and reads mein kampf, allegedly

But you know what it's not one person. He didn't get there on his own. Find the real pillars under this fucking disgusting sack of shit and remove them, dismantle your broken systems and fix this shit

It's fucking ridiculous that this is happening when there's so much we need to be working on collectively

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is literally in Project 2025.

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Has anybody made a checklist?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Banned under Project 2025.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (26 children)

At this stage it will be challenged in the US courts as it is apparently unconstitutional and also illegal.

Supporting non-profits that use the legal system to hold the government to account is the way to go for now.

Also the scope of this remains unclear - it's possible that it will blow up in Trump's face when all the schemes that directly benefit voters disappear, including potentially medicaid. So everyone just needs to keep reminding people that "Trump did this" - make him own the shit that is coming.

[–] LibertyLizard 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Maybe. That is my main hope currently that the courts will at least pause this until it can be sorted out. But what then? Will the Supreme Court actually stand up to Trump even if this is clearly illegal? What if Trump just orders his flunkies to ignore the court orders? This is what I mean—we need to be ready for these possibilities.

I agree that supporting legal fights is a good idea but we need a diversity of strategies here. Mobilize on the streets. Contact congress, especially republicans and point out how this harms their constituents. Support federal employees in organized resistance against this takeover. And be ready to take more disruptive actions if they become necessary.

I am also afraid that many republican voters are too deep in the groupthink to see out of this. Trump can just make up some reason, no matter how flimsy or absurd that their problems are caused by the left and most will believe him. So I am not depending on them to save us, though we should be ready to work with any who will fight with us.

But ultimately I think the time of waiting for someone else to save us is over. It’s each of us or it’s no one.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 day ago

I am also afraid that many republican voters are too deep in the groupthink to see out of this. Trump can just make up some reason, no matter how flimsy or absurd that their problems are caused by the left and most will believe him.

This really worries me. At this point, he could completely mess up the country and the world (as he's trying hard to do), do it completely in the open, blame the democrats for the consequences, and his supporters would believe him. I don't think this will end well.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The supporters want collapse

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think people are underestimating the seriousness of this action.

Ive heard literal lawyers, analyists start so many trump related topics with this sentance and let me tell you, the point where these serious actions were serious was around a year ago. The moment he was not arrested for coup attempt or when courts said "president can do literally anything" was the turning point and now you're just reaping the rewards. Yes they're all underestimated serious actions, no they are nowhere near as serious as the moment you destroyed entire democracy and justice system of the US. No outside of bombing the entire white house there is nothing you can do to stop your new president-for-life.

How long is this belief that trump will act on good faith and respect of the nation going to go on? Since this is literally the only thing stopping death camps, invasions and totalitarian faschism.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago

Federal politics is too wide and deep, too insulated from the average person, and too corrupted by special interests for any realistic plan (like a protest) to have the required effect. At least, that's my opinion. They'll either just get dismissed as a bunch of know-nothing goofs and bulldozed a la Occupy, or they'll be labelled as dangerous and cracked down upon with passion a la BLM.

My best, most actionable and practical advice is to write off the federal government completely. In my mind, they're essentially an occupying force at this point. Instead, focus on forming local networks and connections. Go to city council meetings, go to local advocacy groups, push for change that you want to see there, and organize with other folks there.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

form an affinity group

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

I hate to be pessimistic but just how do you expect us to fix this? The only institutions who have any authority over his actions are controlled by people who have shown us time and again that they're willing to enable his ascent to autocracy and now they see the last election as proof that that's what the American people indeed want. This train effectively has no brakes.

Edit: typo

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Yes. We've been betrayed. Our elected officials do not uphold oaths is office. Half the country no longer wants democracy, they got what they want, and democracy no longer matters. I'm just waiting for them to turn on each other because they are a bunch of sociopaths. But there's a lot of everyone else to fuck over before they start to factionalize. If we don't somehow take back the House and Senate both in two years, we could be in for a protracted darkness.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 32 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The plan was all there for anyone to read on Project 25. The guy says he doesn’t know anything about it during the campaign. First week in office and lots of it is already implemented.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

His "Agenda 47" was basically just project 2025 with less words.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

His voters haven’t been effected yet, when that happens, then something will happen. Maybe.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At this point it's too late. He doesn't need them anymore :/

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago

And “you won’t have to vote again”…

[–] LibertyLizard 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every tyrant everywhere and across all of history needs at minimum the acquiescence of his subjects. If we’re going to resist this we need to wake people from this idea that’s been drilled into us that voting is the only way to change politics. It’s not and never has been.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is something that I wish more people understood.

There is no amount of authoritarianism, no amount of tyranny, that can govern an ungovernable populace. Every nation, ultimately, has the government that enough people are willing to accept. The arc between tyranny and liberty can only move the line on what constitutes "enough".

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Nah, they are too stupid, stubborn, mean-spirited, and oblivious to care. If they even notice they'll just blame the democrats as they always do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 167 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They couldn’t prosecute a sitting president because it would cause a constitutional crisis and the guy has been back in office a week and is already causing them on his own.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

At some point they've gotta realize it's him or America.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 30 points 1 day ago

That was pretty clear about 8 years ago.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Who is they?

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 28 points 1 day ago

This surprises none of them, keep that in mind

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

The President in particular is very much a figurehead — he wields no real power whatsoever. He is apparently chosen by the government, but the qualities he is required to display are not those of leadership but those of finely judged outrage. For this reason the President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it.  -HHGTTG, Douglas Adams

Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - Douglas Adams

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 50 points 1 day ago

The man discovered he is immune to absolutely everything. None of this is unexpected at this point.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it a constitutional crisis if SCOTUS and Congress are on board with this?

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep! It is. But good luck using the impeachment power to remove SCOTUS. It's an unwinnable battle through policy and procedure.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is always the "people's impeachment." I hear it has been popular in France.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

We're more than a week past Day 1 and he's still being a dictator, guys I think he might have been lying.
/S

That was the goal, yes.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Maybe he can't think this far ahead... but if like the article suggest, this is so blatant that the USSC can't let it stand, could this just be to cause a fuss, delay things temporarily as it immediately gets halted, but then also give the USSC a "win" against him to try and show they're not in his pocket?

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump isn't the one doing the thinking.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

EXACTLY! He is a moron and a puppet. He has almost nothing to do with the damage being done in the background by the real evil that is telling him what to do. Hell, he doesn't even understand what he is doing. He doesn't KNOW much of anything.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fwiw, the typical acronym is SCOTUS.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Now that they're majority Republican they changed it to SCROTUS

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›