this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
234 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19490 readers
3724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This idiot seems to be oblivious to the fact that there is no official language in the US, that several US states have Spanish as a defacto co-official language, that Spanish has been spoken in many parts of the US for longer than English, and that there are approx. 60.000.000 Spanish speakers in the US.

A problem here is that since he can't be re-elected, he doesn't have to care about popularity, except for his ego trips.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This idiot seems to be oblivious to the fact that there is no official language in the US

It doesn't matter. Nothing matters. "Small government and low taxes" but when you want to triple the size of ICE and institute historic tariffs (aka taxes) it's OK. "Party of law and order" but when you don't let asylum seekers into the country- overtly breaking US law, it's OK. "The constitution is sacred" but when you sign an executive order that explicitly contradicts the 14th amendment- it's OK.

Nothing matters. There is no consistency whatsoever. There doesn't need to be. The more disjointed, the better. You make people so disoriented that they'll accept anything.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (1 children)

His Latino vote hurt themselves in their confusion

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People don't choose to be dumb or confused. 😔

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes they do. Especially in the west. We all have access to all of human knowledge. Ignorance is no longer an acceptable excuse.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you were born in southern Florida to a set of Cuban parents and told your entire life that communism was the devil and that Trump is the savior against the communist DNC, you'd believe the same thing.

Doesn't matter if you have the whole of human knowledge accessible to you. The human brain is very good at filtering out things you don't want to see.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's not an example of someone choosing to be ignorant. That's someone forced to be ignorant. There is a difference. The majority of Trump's supporters are making a choice.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

The majority of Trump’s supporters are making a choice.

I don't think so. I think people like Elon musk are making a conscious and deliberate choice to embrace fascism. He understands exactly what he's doing and is voluntarily taking steps towards it.

Most Trump supporters are just the Cubans in my previous example. Ignorant and afraid.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Willful ignorance is when people choose to be ignorant, which often leads to confusion.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Is it willful when it is the easiest option to be misinformed?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes, because ease or difficulty is not relevant. The choice is.

[–] don@lemm.ee 43 points 1 day ago

It’s not as if the conservative native Spanish speakers that voted him in were using it for anything.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago

He can barely speak English.

[–] habitualTartare@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The Biden website was essentially just archived and the new administration is working on building up the site. This isn't something specific, almost all the old website links are broken.

“It’s day two. We are in the process of developing, editing and tweaking the White House website. As part of this ongoing work, some of the archived content on the website went dormant. We are committed to reloading that content in a short timeline,” -Harrison Fields

Everything is archived here: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee -1 points 7 hours ago

So the Trump team didn't have even a WIP site to replace as fast as possible the old site?

[–] TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's the part where I'm divided. On the one hand, I understand that they basically have to strip the website down to the basic foundation then rebuild it. On the other hand... I'm not entirely sold that when it returns it will have all of the things it once had. Only time will tell I guess.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We know from Trump's first four years that taking stuff down he doesn't personally like is permanent. He ditched pages on climate change and LGBTQ+ rights and those pages for example.

[–] TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hence why I say that I'm not sold on the idea that they will be coming back... Cautious optimism maybe but I won't be holding my breathe.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is zero reason to be optimistic about the decisions of fhe Trump administration.

My only optimism is about bureaucracy and legal challenges getting in the way of the administration'a attempts to break everything.

[–] TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

You're probably right. I'm just "huffing copium" as the kids say I guess. Already bad enough struggling with anxiety and depression this whole ordeal just exacerbates it so I'm doing what I can to not be completely defeatist/doomer about it. Keyword is trying. So far I'm not doing so hot.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm excited to see the new Bill of Right!

\2. Get guns and do our work for us

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get guns * only if you are a staunch nazi in the party, otherwise we will remove your guns, just like nazi Germany

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good thing I don't have any guns. Just these two asthmatic dogs that cough really loudly right before the Nazi in front of them takes a sudden nap.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

See, I'm a really bad plastic surgeon and that cop came to me wanting a facelift...

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And they flash too!

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I’m not entirely sold that when it returns it will have all of the things it once had. Only time will tell I guess.

If you have any belief that any of this stuff will be returning, I have beachfront property on Mars that you may be interested in.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I mean every administration rebuilds the entire website after inauguration. I think it's telling, though, that they didn't have the full website ready to go.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All these lightning round decisions, I find myself asking, "How does this help anyone?"

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where have you been living the last nine years? This isn't about helping people, the point is cruelty.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No shit. They just didn't have to lie about it anymore.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 22 hours ago

Well, you asked.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

He’s swinging his hate-balls around.

The juvenile helicopter of our doom.

Stupidest population on the planet.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Ay caramba!

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

At least the accessibility page is still up. Oh, wait.