this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
207 points (97.7% liked)

hopeposting

966 readers
140 users here now

Proof of the indomitable human spirit.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I think they probably did it because they wanted more corn.

[–] deus@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

In the same vein, we made chihuahuas because we wanted less wolf

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

When the hero becomes the villain

[–] AnarchistArtificer 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is true, but also, a sentiment that's coming to mind is a mashup of "the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now." And "a society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit".

Most of the benefits of domestication would be seen super far down the line, and if we're talking about humans near the beginning of agriculture, which is (as I understand it), one of the developments that really shaped how humans developed, in terms of how we build communities, knowledge and culture. As a biochemist, I can't really fathom how the practical understanding of selective breeding could even arise in these circumstances. Maybe superstitions that solidify into rituals, which become practical knowledge? Either way, it would surely take multiple human generations for it to even start working, as a crop improvement method.

Linking that back into the two aphorisms I mentioned, the big chunk of time mentioned in them is 1, maybe 2 generations of time. That amount of time feels real to me in a way that 1000 years can't, because I met my great-grandma, and she was a real person, who knew other real people. Crop domestication is so impressive because there's so much gap between the action and the payoff. It also makes me very impressed with humans, because I used to be the kind of asshole that /r/iamverysmart takes the piss of, and I used to fall into the trap of thinking that pre-Enlightenment humans were unintelligent. (I have fortunately learned to value the humanities in the time since then)

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And one smart guy realized you could make a ton of money selling special seeds

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and another smart guy realized you could sell a ton of toxic pesticides. All of a sudden my tummy isn't so happy. :-(

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't see why a chemical used for warfare causing generations of mutations would cause us harm if sprayed near crops

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now, Reanu, everyone will know you're blind if you talk like that.

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Quit trying to hit me and hit me

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

Any other Chinese words?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

True. They wanted more corn to feed their families and descendants.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

The selfish lens to view this through is a modern creation. They wanted more corn for their people.

[–] Atlusb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I know this is important stuff. But right now my brain just wants some of that corn.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I always pointed this out as a joke a while back when there was hella anti-GMO sentiment. If GMO just means it's genetically modified, then you're pretty much SOL when it comes to edible plants we grow; they've been genetically modified through selective breeding and hybridization for centuries that if you went back in time far enough, you won't even recognize your favorites anymore.