this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
40 points (81.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36109 readers
1028 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pagenotfound@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Countries with mutual treaties are going to get attacked. China would definitely take Taiwan and maybe the Philippines.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At first, LOTS of “I told you so” comments on social media. These would quickly disappear as the shit really hit the fan.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We would need to ignore how destitute the rest of the world would need to be for a superpower to full-on collapse in its entirety. I'm also assuming you mean that there's zero semblance of order or organized society.

The military would get recalled and leave American bases, strategic territory, and other occupied areas undefended and open to capture. Economies that rely heavily on trade with the US would need to find new trading partners to prevent potential economic collapse and it might not even save them if they can't get similar enough agreements or pricing. There are countries that also rely heavily on straight US aid, either monetarily or goods, that would collapse themselves or force them to align with whichever country would give them new aid. Global healthcare would dip without the drugs manufactured by the US. No American commodities like oil or food makes prices of those commodities go up everywhere else.

People around the world would be afraid. Whatever you may think of the American government and US politics, the average US citizen/resident is quite removed from the goings on of the federal government. The states on their own have a lot of independence and some would likely survive a collapse in federal leadership, but if federal, state, and local government all collapsed together it would be something serious enough to warrant attention from other countries with similar structure to the US.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Red states would be fucked without that stream of blue state money coming in...lol

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Because there always needs to be someone dragging the rest down?

[–] cash@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is oil an American commodity? Appreciate this might be a different #nostupidquestions.

I always assumed that oil was primarily a middle eastern thing hence the US's interest in it.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61545

The middle east is definitely a major producer of oil, but the US produces even more.

However, what would likely impact the world more than a reduction in crude production is that the US has the largest refinery capacity and exports 15% of the petroleum products it makes. Global refinery capacity is 103.5 million barrels per day, the US constitutes 18.4 million of that. While it's relatively quick for other oil producing nations to bump up their crude production, any major disruption in refining would have huge effects on the prices of petroleum products. Refineries are very expensive and complex. They cannot be scaled up quickly unless there is idle capacity to bring back online.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The next biggest economy would likely fill the power vacuum, which at the moment would be China.
European countries would likely band together but still align their policies closer to Russian polices because they're a more imminent threat than China.
There would probably be several small brush wars as countries try to to consolidate power amongst regional areas like North America and the Middle East.
Fragile ceasefires backed by American influence would pretty quickly dissolve like between North and South Korea.
And in a few decades everything will settle into a new "normal" just like it did when other great empires have lost their influence.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Multinational corporations and crime syndicates and others would be at each others throats, nobody would enforce trillions worth of contracts, USD would be meaningless, all govt services would attempt to go private. mass migration attempts.

[–] Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 week ago

Mexiko and Canada would have a bigger coastline

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

dissolves for whatever reason

As if we all don't know the reason.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the point is the reason didn't matter for proposed question

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That makes sense to me. Haha

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The crash of the US market would bankrupt many organisations that rely on US liquidity to exist.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Stay tune. We are headed that way.

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

We would probably have to learn Chinese instead of English.

[–] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That would be pretty nice to see functioning anarchic societies. You are using the wrong term, you mean anomy.

I think we will get a bit of a taste of that in the next years.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I learned a thing, thanks!

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

OK I read the article two things I have to say. WTF. And how absolutely we have a term for it. But after that it was a great read. But comparing it its still fucked up

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do you say anomie instead of anarchy is the term OP should be using?

[–] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because most people use the word anarchy for a society without rules and without order. Right of the strongest, 365 days The Purge or something like that. But anarchism isn't about that, but about a peaceful way of living without hierarchies and rulers. I was sure, that is not, what OP meant.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My question was about OP's use of the term. Why do you think he misused it? "What do we do if X happens" ---> "anomie is different from anarchy" seems like a non sequitur.

[–] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As I wrote before, I think OP meant to ask what happens if the US falls into a state of anomy. Nearly everybody who talks about that, uses the word anarchy instead, which is wrong.

Should be clear enough now, I hope.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 0 points 1 week ago

Why do you think he was wrong? He didn't say anything that suggested he didn't know the definition of anarchy.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

We had somalia

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Well Peace for one moment & another replacement the second moment

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The world economy would utterly collapse.

[–] loomi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

America gets a cold, the world gets the flu.

And that is just the economic impact.

[–] Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago

World politics would become more complicated. This could lead to more wars and nationalism

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Don. I've put up with your shenanigans for months. Enough. Stop asking stupid vitriolic questions.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago

There are going to be a lot of wars to redraw boundaries, especially in Africa.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Economic chaos for a little while, and then everyone would just go on with their lives. Economically it would matter of course; America became the richest power after the first world war when all of Europe needed loans to fight their "great war", causing the greatest transfer of wealth the world had ever seen.

But culturally, I'm betting the number of people who would give a shit if the United States stopped bossing everybody around is far less than they think it is.

The american sense of importance is strongest mostly in their own heads.