this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
485 points (97.3% liked)

News

23397 readers
4086 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kipo@lemm.ee 34 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Jessie McGrath, 63, a lifelong Republican who is trans, grew up around guns on farms in Colorado and Nebraska. She decided to vote for Harris when Republicans started attacking gender-affirming care and “wanting to basically outlaw my ability to exist”. She ended up being a delegate at the Democratic national convention.

“Government getting involved in making healthcare decisions is something that I never thought I would see the Republican party doing,” she said.

What the actual...how are people this ignorant.

[–] Trae@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

She was 100% on board with them regulating reproductive care because it has never personally affected her as a biological male.

She only has an issue now that her favorite team turned on her after telling her for the last 30 years that she's next.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Assigned male at birth is the term you want to use. "Biological male" is a term used by transphobes to spread misinformation.

Biology is very complex and not your elementary school version of biology. What makes someone "biologically" male? Is it having a penis, having testis, having more testosterone than estrogen, having XY chromosomes? These can all be intermixed with other characteristics.

The "basic biology" definition doesn't work in the real world, and the people using it are actively trying to harm trans people or ignorant. Now you're more informed so ignorance isn't an excuse anymore.

[–] Trae@lemmy.world -3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Who assigned them male at birth? What if they were raised like a cisgender female typically would be in our society?

What makes someone "assigned at birth"? Is it dressing in masculine clothes, is it having a name like Michael and Billy, is it having a circumcision? These can all be comingled with other variations of child rearing.

Just because a parent assigns a "gender" at birth doesn't make it someone's actual identifying "gender". As a young child they have no say in the matter and it's quite frankly wrong to whitewash their childhood history and personal trauma like that.

Now that you're more informed, I hope moving forward you stop trying to erase people's adolescent psychological adversity.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

Assigned at birth is referring to what the doctor writes on your birth certificate. It's not complicated. It has nothing to do with gender.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm not a trans person, but I'm pretty sure that "assigned X at birth" refers to whatever gender is assigned on one's birth certificate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Is there some republican legislation that makes gender affirming care impossible for a 63 year old?

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

At this rate America's 4B movement is gonna stand for "bang bang bang bang"...

i support this line of thinking. Why fuck people when you can just shoot them instead, wait....

[–] Jank@literature.cafe 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I thought the whole point was not to bang?

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Stop banging and start banging!

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

Start blastin

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 37 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Im a liberal guess who now has a gun safe with multiple guns?

I guess we are making America great again by arming the liberals too?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 29 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

American ‘solutions’ for American problems

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What would you do in this situation?

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Stuff that doesn't take 10 levels into rogue to work

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

America, can we stop it with the guns and violence?

I get the idea of wanting to defend oneself, but that ultimately means a shootout. It's hardly going to matter who shot the first bullet in the history books. The far right are also going to arm themselves when they see other people arming themselves. And it's only going to 'prove them right' in their eyes.

Do I have a better solution, no. But more mass shootings isn't going to be the answer. And it's only going to take one shootout before it's used in a legal sense against people. And guns aren't going to be what's made illegal in the United States, especially with a republican-controlled government...

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The far right have already armed themselves. Pacifists just end up at the bottom of the mass grave.

As long as you have no better solution, then defending oneself is on the table. Nobody is talking about mass shootings, but when people are getting beaten up in the streets because the emboldened nazis are walking around feeling their oats, then maybe their intended victims should be given a chance to stay alive, even if it conflicts with your morals. Better judged by 12 than carried by 6.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Unfortunately, in the American system, the only answer is for everyone to have guns

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't like it, but we've made a fucked up situation. Likely the only way we get the momentum to fix it is if things get bad enough though, which I'm not encouraging just pointing out that a large segment of our society has a stupid concept of gun rights which isn't actually in the constitution.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 4 hours ago

I get the idea of wanting to defend oneself, but that ultimately means a shootout.

Study a concept called “deterrence”. It’ll blow your mind.

It's hardly going to matter who shot the first bullet in the history books.

Generally speaking whoever shoots first lives while the other one dies. Above statement makes no sense?

The far right

Admit it. You only refer to “the far right” and never “the right”.

are also going to arm themselves when they see other people arming themselves

We’re already armed, in response to the other people who’ve been arming themselves for thousands of years. The world being a dangerous place is not something we are just discovering now.

Do I have a better solution, no.

Awareness is always a good first step to growth

But more mass shootings isn't going to be the answer.

Buying a gun does not cause maas shootings to happen.

And it's only going to take one shootout before it's used in a legal sense against people.

?? explain

And guns aren't going to be what's made illegal in the United States, especially with a republican-controlled government...

You guessed it. We republicans are going to make women illegal. Such clear headed insight on your part

load more comments
view more: next ›