this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
1099 points (95.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12679 readers
3355 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 hours ago

The deeper tragedy is in the meme as a whole. There has been so much power, control, and hope sucked away from us... and they try to replace it with panic (usually to buy a product or lie). I would like to believe that the situation is not hopeless, and that we are not powerless...

[–] Onionguy@lemm.ee 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Confused the US with the entire world again, honest mistake.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Eh, Canada's about the same too.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago

And you're not even calling out the war in Europe.

[–] deltreed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It's end times folks, only going to get worse before the end.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A shitty life situation has never stopped anybody from having kids. Quite the opposite, the less educated a society and the lower the prospect of comfort, the more kids people have. Poor and miserable people fuck for fun and don't care about proper contraceptives, resulting in more kids. Further more, people believe that the more kids you'll have, the more likely it is that one of them is going to end up rich and successfull.

[–] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Generational-wise, we are having less children then the previous. That's the point of the comic.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

That's because people are actually more educated than ever at least in part thanks to the internet. In most places the standard of living has actually gone up, in some cases quite drastically. So people are more comfortable. A lot of the doomerism stuff doesn't take into account any of the awful stuff that happened in the past, and most are only focused on the USA which is having weird problems at the moment. In most of the world the material wealth of the average person has gone up, not down.

[–] bradd@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago

Things have always been bad.

[–] zealshock 5 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Why is the whole world on fire? These are all mostly American problems.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

A) keep electing far-right leaders and they won't be B) global warming

[–] truxnell@infosec.pub 3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah feeling this, I'm a little tired of one country projecting it issues on the entire world.

That sentence can be interpreted in a number of ways and all are correct sadly.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I know Australia is American lite sometimes, but we also have most of these issues. Shit is going bad in a lot of places is my understanding.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Not really. Most of Europe is just fine. We in the UK have elected a labor government for the first time in several elections as the conservatives severely fucked up multiple times. Far right wing sentiment is on the rise in several countries, but that doesn't make them the majority, so they aren't winning elections anywhere but locally. Mostly the far right are just taking votes from the moderate right.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Its bad, I get it. But lets go back to 1968 when baby boomers who would give birth to the millennial generation was born. Vietnam, political assassinations , race riots, anarchist bombings. Throw in watergate and stagflation. The world has always been burning.

[–] altec@midwest.social 23 points 6 hours ago

The difference is climate change. The better you understand it, the less likely you are to want to have children.

[–] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, climate change was not a concern for them back then.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Climate change was known and covered up by oil companies since the 1930s.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 4 points 2 hours ago

Cool, super irrelevant to the greater point though. It was not known to the people, so the people had hope.

[–] wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You can be damned sure the crazy fundamentalists are gonna have a shit ton of kids. And some of those will vote.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, and they'll die in the water wars too.

[–] RootAccess@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

100% of scientists agree that not-having-kids will solve our climate change crisis in one generation.

[–] steel_nomad@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Fucking lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago

During covid and maybe bird flu if it takes off. Also if vaccines stop being a thing In murica.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (8 children)

If I ever decide to have kids then I'm adopting because I can't in good conscience bring a life into this shitty world

Adopt, don't shop lmao

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

lol, yes Millennials and Gen Z are trying so much harder to fix the situation by voting for change… ohhh wait

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/yes-trump-improved-young-men-drew-young-women-rcna179019

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

So says the headline, but the entire article focuses on males and how much they love that he did shit like Rogan. I'm not saying young women can't also be idiots or angry at the present state of things, but they didn't completely forget that the right sees them as procreation slaves.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4986243-trump-gen-z-voters-shift/amp/#amp_ct=1732198304481&amp_tf=From+%251%24s&aoh=17321982963326&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well yeah, young men bought into all the incelfluencer crap they were being fed. Probably a good thing since young women by and large are flocking the opposite way and absolutely don't want to fuck conservatives.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

If you read the linked article in my post Trump made inroads with young women too.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

I mean, they did vote for change... just not the change we were hoping for, I guess. Things will most likely change for the worse now.

That said, real good change wasn't really on the ballot either.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah I’m afraid that the lesson is that Gen Z is not actually the future, they are going to repeat the past. What makes me sad is that they should have been the future but social media made sure that didn’t happen.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 11 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Did social media make sure that didn't happen, or did the fact that virtually every generation ultimately repeats the mistakes of the one before it ensure that didn't happen?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 97 points 1 day ago (16 children)

garbage health care

mass shootings

violent racism

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Look at this guy who thinks the USA invented racism and holds a monopoly on it.

[–] zealshock 1 points 9 hours ago

I bet they would hold a monopoly on it if they could. Damn I wish they did

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›