this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
205 points (98.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
723 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Didros@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago

Capitalism forces companies to make stupid fucking decisions?!?! shocked Pikachu face

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

>Acquire studios

>Don't make any new games

What's this strategy is called?

[–] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago
[–] RiQuY@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

Stock market.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 78 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Businesses don't care about their employees beyond their output.

That’s because employees are seen as a liability, while holdings are seen as value.

Basically, employees need to be paid, so having a lot of employees hurts your company value. But owning immaterial things helps company value, because you don’t need to pay for ideas beyond the initial investment.

So headlines like these are common any time a company is looking to boost their stock. Lay off a bunch of employees to reduce cash out, use that freshly gained cash to buy intellectual properties (or buy the companies that own that IP) and then sit on the IP because actually using it would require employees like the ones you just laid off. You don’t care about actually leveraging the IP, because simply owning it is what gives you the value bump. You’re not worried about income from those IPs yet, because you’re just trying to make the company larger with the existing cash you have access to.

[–] AutoPastry@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

From Bloomberg

“We definitely want to be in the market, and when we can find teams and technology and capability that add to what we’re trying to do in gaming at Microsoft, absolutely we will keep our heads up,” Spencer said. Still, there’s nothing “imminent” and very large deals are probably off the table at present as the company is spending a lot of time absorbing Activision Blizzard employees, he said.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 47 points 2 days ago (6 children)

They are just buying IP and killing the talent?

I smell microshit and Nokia repeat

Regulators are too busy doing corruption?

I swear they approved these deals subject to conditions.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Things are about to get a whole lot less regulated too. I hope you like poison in your drinking water!

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Microsoft sees Sony with many in-house developers who create AAA hype and profit, like Naughty Dog or Guerilla Games, and they want the same. But instead of growing their own teams, like Sony did, they are buying any reasonably sized developer with the hope that the purchase doesn't affect the final product. Microsoft has been very hands off with the studios that it buys, except Bethesda because Todd needs a babysitter, which reflects this approach of owning but not controlling the studio.

Microsoft doesn't seem to think that firing the people who make the games we love, like Tango Softworks and Arkane, will cause any harm to their brand because they are the monolith Microsoft.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Regulation? In the US?

Not in this timeline.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 2 days ago

surely not in my cuntry, boy

[–] Renacles@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They break the conditions and pay a fine a fraction of the size of the acquisition itself.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Even so any progress the government made is going to evaporate days after the Orange Idiot takes office

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

I recently found out Nokia required Nokia phones. so we've got that going for us, which is nice.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Say the line Bart!

Embrace, Extend, Extinguish

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

They unfortunately forgot the second step and went straight the extinguish.

[–] AutoPastry@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Embrace, extend, and extinguish" (EEE), also known as "embrace, extend, and exterminate", is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found was used internally by Microsoft to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used open standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and using the differences to strongly disadvantage its competitors

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

Microsoft sucks but the phrase doesn't really apply to company acquisitions

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll admit I'm using it loosely here because it's fun

[–] AutoPastry@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Fair enough, I'm being overly pedantic

[–] gammarays@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

OOO HYEAH IM ACQUIRINGGGGGGG

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

The march towards three megacorps running the entire economy continues now that Donnie’s back. It was nice having four years of resistance to unfettered acquisitions.

[–] Not_mikey 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My company just did the same thing. Just layed off 15% of staff because of some bad quarters but is now looking into mergers and acquisitions because they think/know the senile microphone abuser will let tech consolidation run wild.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Can someone help with clarifying a few things?

There is a build up to the full issue, so I'm going to set a few entry questions:

  • Are the acquired studios privately owned or in the market, open for hostile takeovers?
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Wait… if corps are people, have they now got anorexia?

[–] darthsid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Scum. Learn to code, Microsoft.