this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1441 points (98.5% liked)

The Onion

4423 readers
2456 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 198 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

So angry this isn’t even satire.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 117 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I think the only thing to learn from this is that if Jesus himself came down and ran as a democrat, Trump would make jokes about crucifixes and the religious right would start cheering. There is no crossing party lines

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 64 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Oh c’mon, Kamala was pretty far from Jesus, and Trump and co. are no political masterminds. This was the dems race to lose and they brilliantly pulled it off by exhibiting what can only be described as an active disdain for anything that even smelled like progressive politics. Turns out you can’t win on “the other guy is worse.” They fucked up and lost fair and square.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 33 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

Look, the Democrats are not good at running campaigns, but I will never let that obscure the fact that OVER 75 MILLION Americans were ready, willing, and able to vote for a proven rapist, convicted criminal, openly racist, riot-starting adult crybaby. Not grudgingly -- they went to the polls with a song in their hearts and blood in their eyes! The fucking Democrats didn't cause that -- 12 years of Fox News telling people that DJT was God, and four years of blaming COVID and inflation on desperate economic migrants did that.

Even IF the Democrats have enough of a base to overwhelm those +75m hateboner-stroking bigots, well they knew what's at stake and STILL stayed home. (No doubt smirking at how cleverly they avoided any moral contagion via the brilliant gambit of continuing to pay taxes but not casting a vote 🙄 .) Regardless of all that, I don't blame them for Trump's win either, because there shouldn't have been +75 million Trump-lovers to overwhelm in the first fucking place.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

That's not new information. We learned that the first time Trump was elected. We learned it again when Biden was elected, even if Biden managed to narrowly outperform Trump. We've known what we were up against. Stop pearl clutching and acting surprised and start being more pragmatic. The Democrats are the one with a platform at the national level, it's on them to get out their vote and they utterly failed to do that.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago

And that is why the right always wins. The left are lazy and take the high ground and think themselves above it. And the right just does shit. And keeps at it till they get it.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 30 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, but that's democracy. Those 75+ million people wanted something, and they voted for it, and they got it. Anything else is irrelevant. There's no asterisk in the Constitution with a footnote that says the election is invalid if one side consists of hateboner-stroking bigots. If Democrats want something different, then they have to convince enough people to show up and vote for something different. They have to get good at public messaging and at running campaigns. Righteous indignation changes nothing whatsoever.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 25 points 18 hours ago (9 children)

Democrats would have benefitted greatly from reining in the corporate profiteering that happened from the pandemic onwards.

They needed to be the anti greed party or the wealth redistribution party or something. Something different, not more of the same.

It was hard to hear everytime they said "Actually, the economy is doing marvelous."

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 1 points 10 hours ago

Agreed, just a little left-wing populism would've gone a long way. I'm cynical, so I see it as that the Democrats can't be or do those things, because the need for campaign donations has turned them into a fundamentally neo-liberal party that stands for wealth and corporate greed. Like the GOP used to be, before it departed for Crazy Town in a lifted pickup truck.

See also: Joe Biden breaking the rail strike. (Before somebody points he followed up by getting some of the unions some of what they wanted, eroding union power generally was the headline news.) Can we imagine him nationalizing the rails and forcing the companies to strike a deal with the unions in exchange for using them? It would have been a stunning political sensation, but would've crossed Democrats' corporate benefactors.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 26 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think the only thing to learn from this is that [vehemently ignores everything the Dems did wrong]

This article is about and for you, fool.

[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Imagine getting worked up over a satirical comment about a satirical news article in a satirical community

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Fair enough, I ate your onion 😄

In my defense, though, I've seen plenty of people make the exact same argument earnestly many times, especially in the last couple of days..

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›