this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
632 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
4689 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago

I pirate everything, own everything and I'm happy as fuck. I even share my Jellyfin server with 20 other people so they can share in my joy.

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

"If buying isn't owning, pirating isn't stealing."

I heard this before and it is becoming more true each day.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

the only things in life im happy owning is my home, my transportation and my informatics

[–] uis@lemm.ee 8 points 8 hours ago

You'll own nothing and you'll be happy!

Can we get communism already?

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Can someone explain the "be happy" part of the "you'll own nothing and be happy" quote? I fail to see what is there to be happy about.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It came from a speaker a few years ago at the Davos World Economic Forum. Davos is where the ultra rich gather each year to plot out how to be even more evil.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 38 minutes ago

I feel like someone needs to point out that this saying is often conflated with the idea of 15 minute cities.

The idea of 15 minute cities is that people want their amenities within 15 minutes so they don’t have to drive.

It is not an idea to keep you confined and take away your ownership of things.

[–] pinkystew@reddthat.com 3 points 5 hours ago

I'm not OP but I think it means "Providers are saying consumers should accept subscription-based models without complaint"

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

Currently I have hbo max free with my phone plan, plex on nas and my local library. I also have YouTube music family plan, but I started putting songs on nas recently, maybe I’ll replace that too.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Makes me wanna throw out my hp printer I bearly use.
Edit: the printer was discovered broken lol

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

Oh yeah my idea

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

You should. The next time you want to use it, it'll probably do some bullshit. Better to be rid of it now than be coerced into giving HP money in the future. If you need a printer, replace it with whatever Brother laser printer is on sale at the moment.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

we need some kind of "subscribers bill of rights" both to discourage and to check the stupid business models.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

It won't make any difference. There's a gamers Bill of Rights that nobody remembers. It was produced by the owner of a company that now ignores that it ever existed.

[–] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Found this out when I wanted a decent journaling app for Android. All the most popular ones have subscription tiers that amount to hundreds of dollar over just a few years.... for a fucking journal app? what the hell!

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not only that but they can train their AI's on all their subscribers' journal entries. Check F-Droid.org for some free, privacy respecting FLOSS journaling apps.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

There is this one app on there called PTO (plain text organizer) that is pretty interesting. It basically just gives you a new plaintext file each day to journal on

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Definitely feel ya there. I highly recommend Obsidian or Joplin. Not sure what features you're looking for, but I've found Obsidian refreshingly simple. Aso nice knowing that it's just markdown files on my device that can't be sold as data.

[–] jmf@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if you are looking for an Foss alternative for obsidian, check out logseq. it isn't a 1 for 1 copy of obsidian and its feature set, but the way I use them they are identical, besides the source code availability!

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hadn't heard of that one. Looks nice! Do you know if there is a built-in way (even if it's through a plugin) to sync your content across devices? I didn't see anything on their homepage about it.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago

Only third party sync, I use Syncthing for that, works great most of the time

[–] excral@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago

I don't think logseq has fully automated synchronization, at least it didn't when I started using it. What it does have is the option to automatically git commit changes. You can then synchronize through a remote repo. It isn't fully automatic and requires a remote repo you can trust with your data but it works great for me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

F-Droid... An open source app store with exactly that: Apps without BS

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I’m not sure what the logical outcome of this escalating arms race of enshittification will be, but as a career Sysadmin I’ve been able to avoid a LOT of this bullshit through self hosting, which is something a (Non-tech nerd) layman isn’t going to bother with, for as long as existing products (and their subscriptions) are still within “tolerable” levels.

But the thing is, a lot of the convenience with computing devices today didn’t exist in the 90’s, when it was more common for young normies to have what would be considered above average computer technical skills today.

When the entire market turns into inescapable subscriptions, the market for a non-technical friendly appliance box, like Synology came close to doing, shows up to corner the market on hardware you can own and run your own shit on with minimal headaches and no subscriptions.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

To the extent you are able to (particularly if trying to stay legal).

So for streaming content, much of that isn't available to 'buy' at all. Even for the stuff you can "buy", technically speaking in many jurisdictions it's not legal to be able to rip your DVD or Blu Rays or remove DRM from a digital download.

For certain software, on-premise editions have been abolished or priced into the stratosphere because they don't want that market to exist anymore. Some of that software has competent alternatives, but sometimes your choice is dictated by your clients and partners, and opting for a less compatible or merely perceived as less compatible option is a non starter. Even among on-premise editions, a lot of software vendors have switched to still having it by subscription as the only legal way to keep using it. Again, maybe for those software you can get away by breaking the law as a workaround, but legally...

This is of course assuming the conversation narrowly applies to software type things. Everyone is also rebranding 'leasing' as 'as a service' and are copying much of the software playbook, for the same reasons, including making purchase of equipment more expensive to steer people toward the 'as a service' revenue strategy.

Then going beyond the 'tech' industry, it's getting really hard to buy a house rather than rent it from some company that has been pouring money into acquiring all the available real estate.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

In short, people with the money to spend can't be arsed to inconvenience themselves with self hosting or 'alternative' sources.

Folk without the money find a way through perceived necessity and maybe learn something on the way.

Then there's people with the money and the know-how who are just looking to save or do so on principle.

Younger generations grow up with subscriptions and black boxes that are not ultimately under their own control, and lack the knowledge to change it.

It's a sad state of affairs, but their tolerance for ads and subscription slop keeps attention away from people like me.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Counterpoint - younger generations grow up in the same poverty as their parents (so that any subscriptions are unlikely) and even if they don't - their media needs may not fully align with what their parents would buy. So children in my experience do find ways to pirate. Maybe not the best ways, but still.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 minutes ago

It's a good point.

I'd hazard a guess that they are more in the minority than before though. Closest I have seen is friend-of-a-friend referrals for nominal cost pirate IPTV services that provide cable channels & movies. Even then they are paid, and most invite trouble by just going at it without a VPN. Current going rate is £50 for a year here - bring your own Fire stick.

Funny you should mention Synology though, ours is running an Emby server for media here. Having everything properly catalogued (and presented with flair) is fantastic.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 day ago (6 children)

only way i'll be happy with that is if no one owns anything. corporations, people, billionaires. Otherwise might as well burn it all down, why should care if i dont own anything.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 day ago (5 children)

the biggest reason for subscriptions is. 1. consumer laws don't protect it. and 2. you can quit your job and don't have to be actually productive and work for a living because your users will just keep on "buying" the product every month indefinitely. and finally 3. subscription basically gives you monopoly in any given area you host it; because the user will usually not look or even have the means to look for options or alternatives once they have already tied a percentage of their monthly income to a company for the software or service they provide - as wallets got spread thinner and thinner until they, now, are entirely swallowed by subscriptions.

the only people arguing in favor of subscriptions are those who don't want to work for a living while still taking advantage of the capitalist system.

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I worked at Amazon and the head of Ring said their best customers were people who bought a subscription and then put the camera in a drawer and forgot about it. They don't even want to provide you a service. They want you to absentmindedly give them money every month because you forgot to cancel.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›