this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
19 points (61.7% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
4771 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The best part of this is that every search you run has the same environmental impact as clearcutting the Amazon

This may be the worst side effect. Trading efficiency AND accuracy for flexibility.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now I'll finally know how many rocks to eat each day, even if I still won't know how many Rs are in "strawberry."

[–] Virkkunen@fedia.io 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just for the sake of it I asked Gemini advanced how many g are in highlighting:

https://i.imgur.com/SXYikKC.png

AI will replace us all, they said...

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I'm not saying that AI will take over the world but people's fear doesn't come from current AI. It comes from the fact that AI improved massively in just a few years and if it continues to do that, it might become very advanced fairly soon.

[–] PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

next up on our show "shit people never asked for" ...

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 3 days ago

"We have perfectly good search already.." "But it's AI!" "I'll buy your entire stock!"

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

I guess we’ll see how it goes here with the hallucinations

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If someone is interested in AI search, then there is Perplexica which is a self-hosted open source AI powered search engine. It uses your local LLMs instead of OpenAI servers.

[–] justdoitlater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Best reply here, instead of shitting on AI, something usefull! Will try it, thank you!

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

The correct answer to "how to plan a road trip on the Amalfi coast" is

"Don't"

[–] sem@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What are benefits of using openai search when we already have Kagi that is much more privacy a friendly, is ads free and provides the same functionality?

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's wild that they are not breaking even with these prices. I've had an annual subscription since January and made nearly 5000 searches. Extrapolating to a year, I will have been paying about $0.17 per search. If that would go to the electricity bill then it corresponds to about 1 kWh of energy per search, enough to run a 50-watt laptop PC for 20 hours.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

they got very defensive about disclosing their search sources ever since the Brave thing, lol https://kagifeedback.org/d/5185-more-detailed-information-about-search-sources

[–] sem@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My question was about benefits of openai search compared to kagi search. How is this link related to my question?

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The linked post goes into detail about why the author views Kagi as not privacy oriented, and that in the author's opinion Kagi is overly focused on AI. (And was originally started as an AI company)

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And that is very strange for me. Under the news about AI-search from OpenAI I asked about comparison with AI-search from Kagi, but got a lot of downvotes and a link to the post where the author express his negative opinion about AI.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I think it would have helped for the person who posted that to include context, but I would guess they were linking because it also talks about how Kagi isn't privacy focused.

[–] Karkitoo@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

I'm intrigued by Kagi and maybe I'll try it. I like the business model of subscription instead of being the product. I don't mind paying for my privacy. It's not FOSS though, so we may never know if they're not reselling our data.