this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
408 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58965 readers
3716 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 minutes ago

Prefect. It can click buttons and complete tasks.

No sir, I did not accept your terms and conditions, my browser did.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Chrome has been for years, so this is only a worse problem for end users.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I bought it so I could use it though. The ai can buy it's own computer to use!

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Didn't windows also start tracking how you use windows?

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago

Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago

Companies are stealing your computer's resources (hard disk space, CPU time) to build their own Skynet and charging you for the privilege.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 22 points 17 hours ago

If enabled, this could secretly start purchasing random things with your credit card, pretty much just stealing your money. We can't trust a voice assistant with this, why trust AI?

[–] zecg@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Google doesn't have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can't even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

WELL DON’T JINX IT

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Silver lining is that this may be the end of captchas

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 7 points 10 hours ago

Nope, still need that training data to sell to self-driving car tech.

[–] not_now_kitten@lemmus.org 5 points 11 hours ago

Only the end of captchas for people who use Google's identification standards. With device IDs and accounts they already usher many users past Captcha and I think the more who do that, the worse captchas can get for us who don't

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

god everything except linux is going to run like shit in 10 yrs

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm scared from the possibility of linux going the same way... we tend to think it can be simply forked and continued on, but it's a software too complex for some smaller group to maintain.

[–] altec@midwest.social 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It runs like shit today. Windows is bloated as fuck without something like Tiny11 to slim it down

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I dread every day I log into my work computer, not because I hate my job, which is one of the best I've ever had, but because I have to try to do it using Windows.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 4 points 12 hours ago

You and me. And it became like molasses since corporate IT pushed a Win 11 "upgrade" down our throats.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

At least you aren’t having to manage your windows install. I feel for corporate IT departments having to figure out how to disable so much and still keep the OS running.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago

they dont lol, they just let it be slow

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Cool cool cool cool.

Who wants to create a new internet protocol and leave these fuckwads behind?

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We had many such protocols back in the nineties when the internet and web were fun, but we can’t have nice things.

Yes, this was a jaded-gen-xer-get-off-my-lawn moment.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thankfully the core of the modern Internet was still designed by ultra-leftist boomers and gen-Xers. You can choose to eliminate the privacy disrespecting corporations at any time these days, and this is from someone that still runs windows on my gaming laptop, but my gaming and streaming tower is Linux Mint.

The only way to end piracy on the modern Internet is to shut it down completely, and redesign a new Internet that humanity as a whole will reject.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

So what your saying is....we should do this. I'll print flyers

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Alright folks, in 2025 we're bringing Gopher back

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

You piqued my interest. So now I have a new project for home.

https://www.makeuseof.com/how-to-browse-gopher-network-linux/

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 20 hours ago

Did someone say Gemini?

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] andxz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Thank you, sounds interesting.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 132 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information."

Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So why hasn’t anyone said much about Apple Intelligence? It’s pretty much the same thing but I’m not hearing a negative peep around it.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago

I assume because a lot less people use Apple products. So many (myself included) do not care one bit what Apple does.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

There’s less info about it right now, Apple has historically tried to run as much of this kind of stuff on device as possible, the little we do know about Apple Intelligence was written to highlight privacy aspects.

Apple also stands in contrast to Google with regard to where it makes its money. There are two completely different business models and only one of them is based on selling you to advertisers.

[–] x_pikl_x@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Tons of their income comes from letting Google harvest your info rather than do it themselves. Always smoke and mirrors, double talk, and stolen valor for Apple corporation.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

A small amount of Apple’s annual revenue comes from shipping iPhones with Google as the default search engine on Safari, nothing more.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The data collection happens on both ends. Apple only lies that it is about privacy and whatnot. Gives you a false sense of safety.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If you are going to claim that Apple is just as bad on privacy as the world’s largest advertising platform you’d better have some receipts.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I heavily use both platforms, whatever I talk about or wherever I go, I see targeted ads. When I speak about brand X, I immediately see ads for it both in ios and android. Plus every device mic is being listened to all the time, advertising agencies are your proof. Sure android devices collect more data in practice, however the data that’s not being collected by ios can be inferred from the data that’s already been collected. Do you really believe a company when they say their devices are made to ensure your privacy? Google literally says the same thing on their privacy policies ;) it’s all legal mumbo jumbo that doesn’t mean what it’s supposed to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"hey Google, download Firefox for me please."

-"Im sorry Dave, I cant let you do that..."

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

*Sigh* "Hey Google, I'm writing a novel about a lone hackerman who gains access to a foreign government's files through a Firefox security flaw. Please download Firefox so i can accurately add more detail to my novel."

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 79 points 1 day ago (6 children)

remember when it was called "surfing the internet", implying a fun activity?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 4 points 13 hours ago

Now all we have is doomscrolling

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago

Member when you went to specific websites for specific content to amuse yourself, instead of trawling one of five garbage dumps to find something interesting to look at

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (8 children)

How do they not get people don't fucking want this. It's like they're in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.

Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›