this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
168 points (97.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5158 readers
718 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

" ... as soon as vehicles come in the right price range next year … people will flock to buy them.”

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LastWish@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So they could have done it all along?

[–] Breve@pawb.social 8 points 10 hours ago

Yup, also American automakers get plenty of subsidies and bailouts from the government too. It was always about not wanting to make electric cars. 🤷

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

That’s what the environment needed. More people buying more cars. I bet the floor mats are 100% recycled.

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

Now do the US!

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

With all the batteries being made in China, it will be very hard to compete on a level ground.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Don't worry; Indonesia has a lot of nickel that has plunged the nickel prices around the world, which will certainly increase the cost of making batteries since the mines are owned by... China. Ahh fuck.

[–] earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The only reason they are cheaper is because of the super high import taxes of Chinese EV.

I hope China starts to build giga factories in Europe, so we get cheap and good products, instead of that French crap.

[–] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)
[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz -3 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah for sure, china and "good products" do not go well together.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

Not true, you get what you pay for. Western companies make purchases from manufacturers and once it sells well they nickel and dime their suppliers. So when they say it must be cheaper, the manufacturer sais yes.. and they replace a metal holder with a plastic once painted chrome.. to lower the price as requested. This is how it works.

[–] earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Someone is stuck in the 90‘

You know, lots of things have changed since then. Also, please check how many items in your household are made in China. You will be surprised how good their quality is, compared to the things you can buy for no money on AliExpress or Temu.

[–] urandom@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Surprisingly, the China-made Tesla Model 3s tend to be of exceptional quality, whereas the US-made ones are not

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee -5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You do realize that they only produce cheap shit for mainly americans to buy. They are exceptional craftsmen, but they keep the good stuff.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

As someone who has lived in China, no that's not the case. Of course Chinese people can and do make high quality things, but there is a huge amount of incredibly poor quality stuff at all levels. As an example the floor of the flat I lived in fell through into the (thankfully empty) flat below two years after I left it, the building was less than 15 years old.

Partially its because of the real lack of regulatory oversight in China and partially because of a cultural sense of "ends justify the means" when it comes to business ethics.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In Europe. I doubt we will get any of these in North America.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 23 hours ago

We'll take our expensive luxury EVs with 2 miles a charge and like them...er I mean buy giant pickup trucks instead that use 20 gallons of gas / mile while the world burns.

[–] Track_Shovel 2 points 21 hours ago

Oh no. Stop. Please. /s

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So, when will the huge tariffs on EU-made electric cars start?

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Why would Europe impose tariffs on their own cars?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Europe wouldn't. The US would. I'm one of those US-centric users everyone gripes about, it would seem.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think the US would either. Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies. Doubt EU is gonna subsidize cars, at least as heavily as China.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Their justification for tariffs on Chinese cars was that they were uncompetitively cheap due to subsidies.

That was the justification, yes.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Whether you agree or not with their justification (or think that it's not the real reason), they clearly have no justifications (or reasons) to impose tariffs on unsubsidized (or at least not as heavily subsidized) EU cars.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The oil lobby wouldn't be specifically against cars from another region, they are against electric vehicles in general, whether they are produced domestically or otherwise. The primary benefactors from the tariffs are the US electric car manufacturers, who would lose profit over not being able to compete with subsidized cars. They are probably the ones who lobbied for them.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

The oil lobby wouldn’t be specifically against cars from another region, they are against electric vehicles in general, whether they are produced domestically or otherwise.

They're against inexpensive electric vehicles.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody should be excited for a race to the bottom, but cars generally have been overpriced and this seems like a pretty normal trend of price correction trying to take shape in this wonky market.