this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
315 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19043 readers
5262 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 143 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

There’s no such thing as “anonymous” texts — just texts the government can’t be bothered to trace back to their origin.

[–] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago

There was the one case with the scammers in the UK using a homemade cell tower to essentially send out phishing texts directly to cell phones in an area, completely bypassing the phone company. It seems like this scare texts scenario would fit that kind of tech even better, as you only need to send out a message once to a large amount of people and you don't need to collect information in response like in a phishing scenario.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 42 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Well you can send people "SMS" messages from an email system; if you know who the carrier on that number is. usually it's [the phone number]@[their service].

it's not hard to find what the domain name for the email transfer service is, and who owns which cell phone, and they can just buy a list of phone numbers that ping off college cells under specific circumstances that would indicate they're college students.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This guy right here officer ^

[–] Case@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 5 hours ago

I know this type of information from an IT help desk job. Medical IT. Shit gets weird in hospitals.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

What, he works in marketing?

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I receive spam texts from bullshit emails all the time.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Yup.

And you can have an email server in some Latin American country who doesn’t give a fuck (and why should they?) and basically create a new domain when ever you get shut down for spammy spam.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 106 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

WHO!? Who could POSSIBLY be behind such a text!?!? It is beyond fathoming. There certainly isn't a correlation between education and voting lines, or else one party would surely be trying to destroy the education system and bring religion back into schools!

Anonymous my ass.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Also, political intimidation and threats of violence are terrorism, and these people should be tried as such.

[–] nemonic187@lemmy.world 45 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman. Guaranteed they’re behind this.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 35 points 19 hours ago

Almost certainly. How many times have they been busted for this now?

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 29 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm gonna vote even harder

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago

Fill in all the circle.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I trust that our college students are smart enough to see through this bullshit.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t have 20 years ago when I was in college. Somehow I don’t think it’s gotten better.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Really? You would trust a random text telling you that you will go to prison for participating in a cornerstone of our democracy? The internet existed 20 years ago... You really wouldn't have thought to double check?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago

20 years ago, you wouldn't have expected to have social media / internet help you determine whether a threat was real.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 19 hours ago
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago

Dang, I remember a time when the Anonymous hacking group was a force for good....

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 20 hours ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/wisconsin-voter-intimidation/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support