this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
383 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1939 readers
714 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] MelodiousFunk 22 points 1 month ago

For a few brief moments is seemed like everyone around here did not, in fact, forget Sandy. And that red state politicians tried to block aid. But nope, there's Jeff Van Drew, professional balloon knot lubricator and turncoat for hire.

Fuck you, plaid patterned shitstain.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If Republicans could feel shame I’m sure they’d be very upset right now.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 19 points 1 month ago
[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I feel like there should be a follow up of Republicans who voted against FEMA funding then criticized aid and rescue efforts in the affected areas. I imagine it would be a very similar list so it probably wouldn't take long to make.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

First of all, this information was a matter of public record to begin with. Secondly, if it does not already exist, there should be a bot or website that posts which congress people voted for what and when on the regular.

Lastly, I’m appalled at how this article is framing this whole conversation. It feels like they are making this article too much about what the Harris campaign is doing, and less about the people who are voting against funding FEMA.

Then again, maybe I’m reading too much into it. I’d love to hear other thoughts.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You're not reading too much into it. Republican campaign thrives through demonizing the democrats and media profits thrive through pitting one against the other, so there's definitely an underlying goal here.

The fanatical will fanaticise and call this a hit list of people the Dems are trying to get rid of in order to derail Trump's bid for presidency. It will make the people believing that the Dems are controlling the weather even more rabid for an uprising should Trump lose.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

There really should be a website. Or an app. Then if it gets big enough, you could ask for interviews to explain their reasoning. But it could get pretty big, possibly make the country better.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There’s congress.gov and house.gov or CSPAN if you want it all in one place.

Edit: if you prefer commercial there’s ballot-o-pedia.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They should be made to wear signs saying that they voted against FEMA packages while touring their destroyed states. Or are they worried they might lose an election if people actually knew their stances?

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Forcing them to apologize to disaster victims sounds like a presidential act to me.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Immediately thought of Bruce Willis wearing the "I Hate [Racial Slur]" sign

[–] ProIsh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Yes more of this

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago

As well she should.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Several R-FL's in that list

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

My guy, Gaetz, made the list. Because of course he did.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Use that image to reply to every one of them that's kicking up a fuss.