this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
506 points (98.7% liked)

Just Post

618 readers
305 users here now

Just post something πŸ’›

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

once in an onion (satirical news) video I responded to an idiotic trump supporter in the comments with something along these lines using Google translate:

"[English] Yes, MAGA 2024 he is our savior.
[Russian] See my brothers this one has already been fooled. Soon he will worship the Russian empire."

Didn't get a reply, all my trolling for nothing πŸ₯²

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 113 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

This is a smart strategy. "God" is telling them to quit being stupid.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 51 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

For some, maybe. I fear though, that God isn't a real force in most of their lives except when they can wield God as a weapon against the vulnerable

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago

What else do you need a God for if not to grant divine authority to dehumanize anyone or anything you don't like?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 9 points 4 weeks ago

In my experience, Christians view their faith as a tool they can use by twisting it into a cudgel and beating anyone who disagrees into submission.

Whether they're consciously willing to vocalize that on the other hand...

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 28 points 4 weeks ago

Unfortunatly they replied by sharing 10 cooking videos from facebook 🫠

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

It’s not hard to just say, no, you don’t know the will of god.

It’s why we have so many different sects.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe, but god damn I would hate for the Democratic Party to get taken over by religious psychopaths.

Though I agree, I believe if it were to happen it would either be very slow, or instantly cause a third party to emerge.

[–] Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 90 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

finally a form of weaponized christianity i can get behind.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Getting behind is banned in christianity meta. This is your first warning

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago

It can be if you don't have the right tools1234566890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm

[–] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Nope, definitely the gays. Did you know they collectively stole the rainbow from god? Scandalous.

/s

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 18 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Rumor has it that they hijacked hell and turned the first 3 circles into a nightclub, a B&B, and a spa

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

Gentrification is out of hand these days

[–] Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

ah yes the gentrification of Hell.

[–] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, it's all fictitious headcanon, I'm on board with this one.

"And as God declared homosexuality a sin, he made his second mistake, because their over representation led to a fabulous revolution. Fighting back against homophobic demons and damned souls, and freely inviting the homosexual demons into their territory, they created a vibrant new hell... With blackjack, and hookers."

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Is that why all those demons are so fabulously dressed?

Compared to the white cloth that angels wear.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago

The devil wears Prada???

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I'm the official gay and I have my voucher for a penthouse suite and a bitchin meet and greet with the man himself, so you best believe that nightclub is my top priority. Well, once I finish having raunchy scandalous sex with adorable, hung subs. And I don't even have to wait to die for that!

It's so good to be so bad 😏

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 29 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

Sorry bud, I'm not young enough to know what that means and I have too much pride to look it up.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it means "I agree/support this".

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Remember when it meant "damn, that is legitimately an unpopular opinion that you apparently actually stand by. Props."?

I remember.

Now it just means "lol tru"

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Copied from an older comment of mine:

"Based" (corruption of base head - from someone who smokes base - street name for crack cocaine) was popular as an insult in rap / African American circles in the early 00s

Rapper Lil B got called it and decided on a whim to pretend the meaning was changed to mean something positive, started using it in this way, it caught on - mostly through the new York scene and its attendant twitter following

As all slang does in the last ~100-150 years, passed from black people to everyone.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Huh. I thought it originated with "based in reality" or "based in fact" to refer to something that is inherently true.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Wow, what an unexpected turn of events! Thanks for the history lesson!

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Tough word to define. "Based" comes from black culture, if I recall correctly. To describe something as based means, essentially, "I see that you are strong in your convictions and I approve of your position", implying perhaps that a person's opinion is potentially controversial. It also could be, "You have strong views that align with my subculture."

I've seen "based" used to describe a lot of things in the last ten years. Teenagers describing their desire to overthrow the capitalist system. Ecologists feeling that we should ban cars and return to driving buggies. Neonazis acknowledging another's dogwhistle. Usually, people are based, not ideas themselves.

You think most social media is stupid and you think we should nuke the internet? That's pretty based.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

So the OOP here was probably saying something like:

"I disagree with Christianity, but I see your (possibly cynical) use of its principles as a way to combat a larger problem as good."

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

I don't know something

...ok, that was always allowed.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Why would I crop it? I ain't got nothing to hide!

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

To improve the quality of the image

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

But then it would be a lower resolution and have far fewer pixels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

Your use of double negatives betrays you, acquantance of Mary...

TBF, the timeline checks out.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Jesus - the eternal light - shines down on us.

Installing solar panels is to open the window to jesus.

that's hilarious

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I know everyone here loves being edgy, but idolatry is forbidden, and Sodom and Gomorrah was about not following God’s word. (PS I am angry the homophobes have co-opted a story about Charity and Faith)

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

What about all the numerous catholic saints that are idolized af? They literally have idols of them all over churches and homes.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yeah, that's one thing I don't get, and am unfamiliar with catholic dogma, so why is it okay for saints to be literally idolized by modern catholics? Or is it one of those "no true Scotsman" things...

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not Catholic, or religious at all, but I've had the same question. They don't "idolize" the saints. To them praying to a saint or depicting them is more of a conduit to God. They see it the same as asking your neighbor to pray for you/a loved one. They believe saints are messengers delivering their prayers to God.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

They pretend not to, but I grew up Catholic and I’ve known people who feel direct, holy connections to sts. Anthony or Jude. It’s one of the things that allowed Catholicism to be so effectively spread: people didn’t have to lose their old gods. Saint Brigid is just a revamp of the Celtic deity Brigid, for example.

Raised Catholic, and basically that's it. I interpret it kinda somewhere between asking your crush's friend to tell them you like them, and asking your writer friend to help you write a good love note. Idolatry would be like if you tried to date your writer friend or your crush's friend, instead of your crush.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Because Arabic and Jewish culture value the uniqueness and singularity of God, while the Pagan cultures of Greece and Rome (where Western Christianity developed) valued multiple persons in divinity with responsibilities over different aspects of life.

When Christians were oppressed by Rome, their crime was not worshiping Jesus. But rather their refusal to participate in ritual or pay respects to the other official State gods.

[–] sibannac@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Growing up Baptist, this was one of the reasons they differentiated themselves from Catholics.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Are you saying that because idolatry is forbidden no Christian could engage in it, even unwittingly? Because it sounds like that is what you're saying and it's pretty obvious that isn't true. Tons of people who call themselves Christians idolize the shit out of Trump for some insane reason I'll never understand.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί