this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
834 points (97.6% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3691 readers
774 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry or fascism. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable, neither is supporting people who actively want to kill those groups. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 63 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Picked up the Bluray series off eBay. Physical media seems like the way to go, to really own anything

[–] MelodiousFunk 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same. Bummed that we'll probably never get remasters of DS9 and Voyager.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is a nice DS9 upscaling project that is very good (not as good as a proper remaster, but still impressive).

https://ds9redefined.wordpress.com/videos/

They only provide download instructions (sftp) via discord, unfortunately. (https://discord.gg/qTgXcG9T). It's very large (300+ GB for the series).

They are working on Voyager now.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Iirc, the studio(s) likely wouldn't be able to do much better for Voyager as they didn't record Voyager onto film like the others. They cheaped out and recorded direct to VHS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Physical media seems like the way to go, to really own anything

That or sailing the digital sea, which ig you could consider a bunch of DRM-free files on a drive you own to still be "physical media"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

... Ripped to a media server. It'll be a cold day in hell before I can be arsed to stand up and put media into a machine anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The federation is like living at your parent’s house. Things are free under their roof, but if you want to drink with Quark, you’re going to have to trade your star fleet allowance for latinum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago
[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does Paramount have ads?

#kodi_life

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not as invasive as others for now, but yeah.

[–] Dohnuthut@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Have it included with Walmart+ and so far everything I've watched has had one 30 second ad at the beginning and I can return anytime without having to watch anymore.

[–] ccdfa@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Walmart+ ?? Is that a joke?

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

We found the subscriber.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The real problem is Paramount+ won't accept any of my worthless gold.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Press it with latinum, hyu-mon.

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Clent@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Arrr, matey!

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Stremio + torrentio + real-debrid friends.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Dunno what kind of economic model we'd need if we had star trek -level replication technology.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We could just explore, try to learn new interesting things, and have campy holodeck adventures with Mark Twain.

I don't think the current rich people would approve. But screw'em if we have replicators

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always thought the "you wouldn't download a car" ads were based on an assumption that star trek replicator technology would be evil (with the public argument that it would put people out of jobs and the real reason being it would be harder to base a wealth-based hierarchy and system of middlemen on).

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The original ad was "you wouldn't steal a car," literally claiming that downloading a movie is morally equivalent to carjacking.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At this rate, replicators will be in a subscription model.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We'd probably need a very similar model.

Replicators don't replaces services, just goods. Most people aren't willing to render services for free.

The replicators also use enormous amounts of energy. They're basically nukes in reverse. They "solve" this problem with anti-matter but the anti-matter reaction seems to require trilithium. And as we know from several episodes, trilithium is definitely not an unlimited resources.

The economy might not involve anyone hand-making widgets but there would be a lot of economics around acquiring, processing and distributing trilithium.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure by the end, even Roddenberry had come to accept that humans will never be so selfless as a species and the Starfleet he dreamt of could never exist. That's why his later stuff was more bleak. There's just absolutely no way that the money free world they describe is good for everyone

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I believe there is a way. Nanotechnology helped along by artificial intelligence could conceivably bring material abundance to everyone. This would be a world dramatically reshaped. Humanity might not even qualify as the same species anymore.

Some people actually think that such a future is an inevitability; that it can't be stopped. Short of everybody dying in a fire of course.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the human race dying before we reach those dreams is far more likely

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Hey, fuck this meme and the starship it rode in on.

load more comments
view more: next ›