this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
211 points (95.3% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4445 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How will you make groceries more affordable.. We will add a 10 or 20 percent tax on imports.. that wil surely make everything cheaper. The Dems should be putting this front and center.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That will make groceries more expensive not less.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 40 minutes ago

Yes, I believe that’s their point.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago

No. A losing campaign looks like 2021-01-06. That's what a losing campaign looks like. It ain't over until the fat lady sings. Republicans are disenfranchising known Dem voters, making it hard to vote for people they suspect won't toe the line, and have people out singing the praises of alternative Left-Wing candidates to everyone who will listen, taking advantage of the 'the Left has to fall in love, the right falls in line' factor. Check your registration. Check the last day to register and check your registration again on that day (at least, I'd check weekly until the last day). Make sure your address is correct and you have the proper things to jump through flaming hoops and moats filled with crocodiles because Team Pepe WILL throw that shit in your way. And make a plan to vote. You got to get your vote for Harris (and nobody else other!) locked in on or before election day. Deliver a resounding no to Team Shitgibbon!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 124 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

We said that in 2016 too.

Oh, how we laughed.

Ha! Ha!

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 39 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We should laugh. It's better for our mental health. It deflates their image in the eyes of those who share our laughter. And it drives these shit heads even more nuts, making them act even weirder, and making us laugh even louder

What we mustn't do is get complacent. We need to push hard no matter how we think it's going. If it's a tight race, we fight to take the lead. If it's looking like a victory, we fight to make it a blowout. The bigger the margin, the harder it will be for Trump to fight it after, and the more likely it will be that we won't have to deal with an impossibly divided and obstructionist legislature.

Vote, and get others out to vote too.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Vote, and get others out to vote too.

Be sure to check your voter registration too. @ Vote.gov Also, you might want to register as an independent in rabidly red areas.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

Ho ho!

Wait

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah, a few weeks ago they were supposedly coasting to the nomination. Add to that that only like 7 relatively small states are the only ones that really matter, so you can't really judge based on general vibes.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 59 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Adding to the self-harm, Vance indicated that the Trump health-care plan would allow insurers to resume denying coverage for preexisting conditions. Trump himself proclaimed that he would address high food prices by barring food imports—a policy guaranteed to raise costs instead. All but two Senate Republicans got baited into voting yesterday against a law to protect in vitro fertilization from state-level abortion restrictions. Meanwhile, Republicans in the House seem to be stumbling toward forcing a government shutdown because Trump vetoed their own plan to fund government operations through the November election. That’s all just in a single week.

Cripes. Remember when that was every fuckin’ week? FFS how are these cultists so goddamned stupid? Massive propaganda and cult brainwashing would seem to only go so far.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

They WANT a shutdown, because then they can scream about how BIDEN ALLOWED THE GOVERNMENT TO SHUT DOWN!!!! The mistake of many people lies in assuming that the GOP, and Trump's campaign in particular, hinges on or really cares about truth.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Is it possible the GOP is attempting to defund the election so it can’t happen?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No, they have many other plans, mostly to try to create legal arguments at the last minute for why the election should happen but was illegitimate.

Basically 2020 on steroids because they have the money for lawyers already.

But also, there's hope this is trumps last hurrah, and after this the party will magically go back to only caring about tax cuts and gun rights, like this was all a bad dream.

I think you massively underestimate how hard paleoconservatives are trying to delusionally rationalize their way out of this so they can both get the votes of the racist, violent dixiecrats, while always pretending they aren't actually a part of the party.

They just want to get back to that again.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Repubs are allowing some citizen to veto their bills.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Because boomers are on Medicare, and they believe in their principles that socialized medicine via the government is absolute evil!!!

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 24 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

He look like Garth Brooks and Charlie Kirk had an abortion together.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Thank you for that image I can’t get outta my head.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Great thumbnail. Invokes the article title beautifully.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Butthurt salad comes to mind for some reason.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 6 points 19 hours ago

That's the expression of someone who let rip what they thought was a fart but got more than they bargained for.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

that guy is definitely wearing eyeliner

[–] Quill7513 40 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Which would be fine if we wasn't such a weirdo about men who aren't him wearing makeup

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago

Oh absolutely. If his party supported drag shows (or personal expression in general), I would have no problem with his makeup choices.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago

I want the thumbnail of Vance looking pathetic to be the thumbnail every time an article is paywalled

[–] captainWhatsHisName@lemm.ee 6 points 19 hours ago

I’m pretty sure the Atlantic works if you disable JavaScript. For example using the noscript plugin. Also the articles are on archive.org.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

This works for me on Firefox and Fennec.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 9 points 20 hours ago

“why, not even God Himself could sink this ship!”

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 8 points 19 hours ago

This is what failing as a human being looks like.