this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
132 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5785 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (4 children)

We need to treat every state as a battleground state

Presidential campaigns cost over a billion dollars these days, if that's not enough to campaign in 50 states, where the fuck is all that money even going.

A billion dollars is an insane amount, I legitimately don't understand how either party can claim with a straight face they need or even use close to that much

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The main reason Texas is not "in play" it's because everyone assumes it can't be "in play". Over 5 million registered Texans did not vote in 2020! Among them there is definitely 700k Democratic votes and that would be a landslide win for Harris.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Indiana is never "in play"...

Except when Obama carried the state ~~to the point they even got a Dem governor...~~

Then we started running moderates again for president, they got Pence who caused an HIV epidemic and then the whole country had to deal with him as VP.

The problem is what "red states" need to turn blue isn't what the DNC is willing to give.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Eh, Mitch Daniels wasn't a Democrat.

Was just about to come on here to say this. Joe Kernan was actually the last in a line of Dem govs of Indiana (following Evan Bayh and Frank O'Bannon)

I'm a bit surprised here that the OC (givesomef... ) admitted to his mistake, considering that in the past he's ignored similar requests for clarifications. E.g https://lemmy.world/comment/12300100 , https://lemmy.world/comment/12283806 , and especially https://lemmy.world/comment/12087110 (where giving a positive answer would have really helped me out).

(That said, I suppose I can understand ignoring something like "Citation needed" as not everyone wants to spend the time stay informed by looking things up and following up).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a lot of learned helplessness in Texas.

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Part of it is because our congressional districts are drawn like a bowl of spaghetti. In statewide elections it matters less but congressional districs were specifically drawn to pack and crack votes here.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Absolutely, plus all the effort by the entrenched Republicans to keep putting more and more hurdles between voters and the ballot box. And all the effort to drive vulnerable minorities out of the state with bigoted laws.

Hell, I'm a cishetwhite guy and I feel like they are trying to drive me out too.

Absurdly wealthy media controlling billionaires donate to pacs who then spend the money on... media

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine how many children could be fed with that money. Absolutely immoral.

load more comments (1 replies)

Campaigning in all 50 states and treating all of them as battleground states are not the same thing. The latter is harder and more expensive.

As to why a billion is not enough, blame the SC for allowing Citizens United in 2010. After that the amount of money just got higher without end in this crazy arms race.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Glad to hear. Next up, the geographical map if we're lucky.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Truly a rabbit ahead of his time.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With rising sea levels, all in due time. My uni did a map of FL at different sea levels. None of that state is very far up out of the ocean.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I looked at peak elevation on the keys one time because a buddy of mine was posting pretty crazy splits on some runs. Gtfo with your shit Doug.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not too much though. Florida makes a great breaker for those hurricanes. Get rid of most of it or make it all swamp, you'll have more storms into the core areas.

We may get that anyway with stronger storms, Florida or no Florida...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nice wiki link. The Talk section is also interesting, mainly concerned with the list of cities that are called Fall Line cities in the two Fall Line entries. I noted it because my location is on one list but two other places more eastern are on the other list, so it seems to be a very ambiguous definition, as geology tends to be.

But Florida isn't, so suck it! :p

(Although Florida isn't all low, there will be Floridian islands still, for a while)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm from Georgia, and the definition is completely unambiguous around here. Maybe it just seems more ambiguous in the Mid-Atlantic region because the escarpment gets a lot closer to the coast.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wish Florida would just break off and sink into the ocean. And I live here.

[–] kittehx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

climate change will do that soon enough

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

Florida has historically been held up as a massively important state for any White House aspirant, and as a result has been on the receiving end of large candidate rallies, surrogate events and huge sums of national money fueling wall-to-wall campaign ads across the state’s 10 expensive media markets. But for the first time in recent political memory, the 2024 presidential race has left Florida as a comparative afterthought.

If you ever wondered why Florida and Texas have been turned into such conservative hellholes, this is exactly why. Both were starting to turn bluer, and the Republicans didn't want to lose those precious electoral college votes.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 month ago

Aww, poor Ronnie looks so sad. He was gonna be president. It was gonna be so great. He’d eat pudding with his fingers at every press conference. At the state of the union, he’d add a banana. And now that’s all been lost. No charisma. No personality. No hope for becoming president. Poor little guy in his ridiculous lifts is so dejected.

Good. Fuck him. Asshole.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

30 electoral votes don't simply disappear

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Florida isn't worth the time to be a swing state. They don't listen to facts and get more conservative every chance they can. Spending time campaigning in FL for democrats is simply a waste. May as well campaign at a graveyard.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Except if you're Obama and won Florida twice

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

May as well campaign at a graveyard.

I mean, that has been part of Trump's strategy.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

May as well campaign at a graveyard.

Given the number of boomers who live there, you might be more right than you know.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No but the chance that you change the vote to your side does go away. Florida isn't competitive anymore so not much point in either side spending here.

A lot of republicans have moved here and a lot of democrats have left. Add the fact that the Florida democratic party is a mess even compared to other state parties and I don't see things changing.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One poll that shows them losing by 1-2% instead of 4-5%. I'll still vote and I hope I'm wrong but I'm Expecting a all the state wide races to go R.

I think the abortion rights amendment has a good chance of hitting the 60% required.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Which is the reason DeSantis is trying to bully the vote.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Florida's status changes depending on how many retirees move to the state in any given year. When many move, it usually goes more conservative.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

At least they are gerrymandering themselves like that, concentrating their votes in Florida.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We were just talking about that. It was glamorized in media for years and many of the television addled moved there. Thus Florida Man was formed.

load more comments
view more: next ›