this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
115 points (99.1% liked)

Solarpunk Travel

664 readers
3 users here now

Community for those focused on sustainable travel. Our society's current levels of energy intensive and frequent travel are not compatible with life on a finite planet. We advocate for long-term slow travel to see the world, and low energy local travel to deeply experience your community. Green washing free zone.

related to sustainable travel:

related to travel generally:

The communities listed above are decentralized. Centralized instances are omitted as they go against the fedi purpose and it’s better to cultivate digital rights in the free world. That means instances that have a disproportionately large population or are centralized on Cloudflare are not listed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tax subsidies on avation gas? Where as none on trains (subsidies)

[–] MrMakabar 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no taxes on aviation fuel and no VAT on flights. Both apply for trains.

[–] starlinguk@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

So it's the fault of the governments? What a surprise. /S

[–] Jajcus@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why guessing, when the answer is in the article?

[–] Alcor 10 points 1 year ago

Suggesting that someone read the article in a comment section under said article…blasphemy!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 15 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


France will increase taxes on flights to invest more in its railways, the country’s Transport Minister Clément Beaune announced this week.

Last month Greenpeace released an analysis showing that taking a train is on average double the cost of flying.

The report compared the costs of flight and train tickets on 112 routes in Europe, including 94 cross-border connections.

Dardenne counters that the climate crisis is a much bigger threat to tourism and points to the example of wildfires and heatwaves in Europe this summer that have been disrupting holidays on the continent.

The European Commission has been working on an upcoming ‘Regulation on Multimodal Digital Mobility Services’ to improve the process of booking tickets across rail, bus and air.

It says this could be funded by windfall profit taxes, the phase-out of airline subsidies, and a fair taxation system based on CO2 emissions.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Neon@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

maybe don't use a Picture of the SBB, probably the best Train Operator on the entire Continent, for this Article?

anyways, i just compared SBB Zürich -> Généve: 48.- / 44.20 CHF. not even comparing the zone subscriptions you can use to save money if you frequent a route.
Airplane Zürich -> Généve: min. 94.- CHF

for any other country it probably holds up though

[–] MrMakabar 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you go international that stops pretty quickly thou. Berlin - Zürich is something 226€. A flight costs 209€. The issue is no kerosine tax and no VAT. German VAT on that alone would raise costs to 249€.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why was the vat removed for flights?

[–] MrMakabar 1 points 1 year ago

For international flights, but in Europe that is nearly all of them. The idea in general with vat is that is paid for every consumption within the country. However it being international, it is no longer domestic so it does not apply. For trains it ends up being domestic travel in one country and then the other, so vat applies.

[–] thisfro 1 points 1 year ago

You can't use zone subscriptions on most IC connections and 48.- is also only with a half-fare subscription. So basically equal price.

[–] Nortempeh 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Without proper info and data we are swimming in opinions and anecdotes and not able to vote for something rational.

Tax exemptions for aviation is a problem. A bigger problem yet is that the environmental costs are not charged to the user (in both aviation or trains).

But even considering that, I suspect the train tickets would still be to expensive, relative to aviation. And that is, in my opinion, due to the inherent lack of competition in trains and relatively easy to implement competition in aviation. Train and train infrastructure companies need more accountability


big vehicles in dedicated tracks should result in very inexpensive tickets, why aren't they?