this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
165 points (97.7% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9539 readers
426 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Must be from a non-developed country. This kind of thing doesn't happen in the 30 developed countries with a legitimate healthcare system in place.

Canadian here.

We got 2 of them for our kid. We didn't have private insurance at the time. I think they were 50$ each. We thought THAT was expensive.

1000$...wow... And that stuff expires quickly too.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

https://www.emsstuff.com/epinephrine-1mg-vial-anaphylaxis/ literally the same stuff that's in the epi-pens. In case anyone needed to be more infuriated about this.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah it’s the patents on the auto injector and their evergreeening

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can't even buy the vial at that price unless you have a license or DEA number. It probably costs a lot more for a regular person.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 9 points 1 week ago

That's not the point.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The point is it could be super cheap for people but its not purely because of profits.

People pay more for the injector than the drug.

The real (rhetorical) question is how much does the need for profit outweigh peoples actual lives?

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you have that many dangerous allergies I am not sure why you would go to any restaurant anymore.

Still, healthcare there is obviously fucked.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, sick and disabled people shouldn't live their lives or leave their homes.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No but i would rather be alive and cook at home than go to a restaurant and die if i was that person.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They did point out that they believed the food to be safe in the restaurant.

They might have thought everything was above board, but it turned out to not be the case.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

But you forget that the guy chose to have his allergies, just like his sister chose to be too poor for basic modern medicine.

The true victims are the restaurant (I bet they ran out on the bill when he had "almost" anaphylaxis) and Pfizer for having their good name slandered on the internet.

[–] LaVacaMariposa@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, but if there's a decent possibility that you might die if someone is not careful with your food, and you don't have access to an epi pen, then why risk your life for a single meal?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

There's a decent possibility that you'll die in a car accident, why risk going anywhere?

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago

Right, this is a total binary question, there is obviously no nuance in how sick or disabled someone is so just kill them all and be done with it... /s in case someone misses the obvious sarcasm.