this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
193 points (99.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6591 readers
528 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why have a P-38 when you can have a F-38!

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jimbolauski@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

2×F16=1E2C

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Thats the joke.

The P-38 is a WWII era twin fuselage fighter.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No. It's a twin engine fighter. It only has one fuselage. The fuselage is the main body of a plane, which holds the cabin for the pilot in this case, which there is only one.

Edit: The concept here in the top left would've made it a twin fuselage plane. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning_fighter_concept_silhouettes.png

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What if the co-pilot is in the other side? He could become the pilot if something happened to incapacitate the pilot, and can also cast a tie-breaking vote in the senate.

[–] Estiar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vice Pilot Kamala "Bomber" Harris

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

God, if she said "Putin had sowed the wind and now Moscow shall reap the whirlwind" that would get all of my votes.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I stand corrected, didn't think it through that much.

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 3 points 1 month ago

Technically an interceptor, but in reality A FUCKING BADASS KILLING MACHINE.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Glad someone got it

the above is more like an XP-82 than a P-38.

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Putin should've thought twice about invading Cloud City

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

He never accounted for Lobot

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

A tomcatamaran.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

THAT is some class A photoshop work.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that like a class A misdemeanor

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your face is a class A misdemeanor

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

That’s not what your mom said. She let me off with a warning.

A firm warning.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 month ago

Also, if you cast enlarge on an F-16, radius-based spells get pretty powerful.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It worked for the ‘stang; it can work for the viper.

~go~ ~the~ ~distance~

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He’s all alone ^all^ ^alone^

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All alone in his time of need

He’s jinking

and plinking

and plotting his coords

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Somebody needs to remove the "Non" from this forum, because I find this completely credible.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that an F-32 or an F-256?

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 month ago

Do they have to mind link the pilots together to be able to work completely in tandem like in Pacific Rim? 🤔

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Hey I know a twin pod cloud car when I see one

[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago