this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
165 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

34778 readers
87 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
165
Climate scientists flee Twitter as hostility surges (www.france24.com)
submitted 2 months ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Researchers have documented an explosion of hate and misinformation on Twitter since the Tesla billionaire took over in October 2022 -- and now experts say communicating about climate science on the social network on which many of them rely is getting harder.

Policies aimed at curbing the deadly effects of climate change are accelerating, prompting a rise in what experts identify as organised resistance by opponents of climate reform.

Peter Gleick, a climate and water specialist with nearly 99,000 followers, announced on May 21 he would no longer post on the platform because it was amplifying racism and sexism.

While he is accustomed to "offensive, personal, ad hominem attacks, up to and including direct physical threats", he told AFP, "in the past few months, since the takeover and changes at Twitter, the amount, vituperativeness, and intensity of abuse has skyrocketed".

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ghostface@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are they being encouraged to move to mastodon?

This would be q great time to provide thw fediverse

[–] chobeat@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Bonfire, with its direct support for OpenScience features, would be a better alternative

[–] agegamon@beehaw.org 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly I'm shocked at the number of people that stayed on twitter. Like... just why? It's zero effort to leave and minimal effort to find another platform.

I realize many people choose not to care who owns the companies that make their stuff. And to be fair, sometimes it's actually worse to throw away the product than keep using it despite the associated image. I still daily drive my Tesla model 3 that I bought in 2019. Throwing away a car creates a shitload of waste, versus just continuing to drive it. I'd never buy another tesla, which solves that issue.

But unlike throwing out a car or even throwing out something with actual value like youtube, ditching Twitter as far as I see has no downside.

[–] epidemian@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

ditching Twitter as far as I see has no downside.

I'm curious: have you ever liked Twitter?

Because i could understand not seeing any downside to leaving a site if one has never actually liked it. But, many people liked (and still like) Twitter. I personally have known many interesting people there, and even started some nice in-person friendships. I don't like at all what's become of Twitter; i have it now blocked through the LeechBlock extension so i don't fall into doom/shit scrolling. But i think there's still some good in there. I can totally understand how many people would find it difficult to fully leave; myself included.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Scientists don't have to explain why they're leaving twitter. The reasons should be obvious to anyone familiar with Twitter.

Journalists need to explain why they're still on Twitter, given that platform has so much bots, trolls, hate and lack moderation.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The BBC still uses it to break news, I'm saddened to say.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago

Legacy racist media supports modern racist website? Shocked.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I never understood why people would want polluted air and water, blows my mind.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Because either money or cult like following.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because they love and believe their corporate daddies they so worship, especially in the US.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

It's so fucking weird

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because it's easier than giving up luxury items

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

I guess, but I dunno, that still seems dubious to me.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 13 points 2 months ago

Not surprising - many scientists fled to Mastodon when he first took over. What took them so long?

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 12 points 2 months ago

vituperative
/vī-too͞′pər-ə-tĭv, -tyoo͞′-, -pə-rā″-, vĭ-/

adjective
Using, containing, or marked by harshly critical or irate language.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 2 months ago

Musk won of course...

As usual billionaires ~~buy~~ get their way. Too many people that aren't brainwashed "conservatives" on there for his liking so he took it over and now look at where we are...

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago

I'm just waiting for Musk to sue all people on earth for either not having an account or for abandoning their account on Twitter.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago

Anyone with a modicum of intelligence should leave Twitter. It is a cesspool of degenerates now. Best to let it fester and die.