this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

4167 readers
2 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community

https://mapcomplete.org is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How does your everyday map look like? Which map style do you use?

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The rendering in Organic Maps is great I think.

[–] youslashuser@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, OSMAnd's rendering is clunky

[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yeah Organic Maps is so beatiful! Osmand looks kind of ugly. I am an engineer and Osmand style looks like it’s made by an engineer while Organic Maps looks like it has received the love of some caring designer!

[–] youslashuser@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

OsmAnd re-rendering whenever I move the mapsl sucks arse. Very bad UX.

[–] AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's imo better looking themes for it. I like the look of the cycloroute theme, toned down greens etc. But I am so used to the standard osmand theme that I just keep using that.

[–] ilumium@eupolicy.social 1 points 1 year ago

@randomaccount43543 @youslashuser So true, plus @organicmaps loads much faster. On the other hand, #OSMand has more features for power users.

[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Last week I was driving with my sister and she said, looking at OsmAnd: "What app is this? I don't understand anything on that map!". I think that it takes some time to get used to OsmAnd map style, but it's very clear after you understand it (clearer than Organic Maps, in my opinion).

[–] FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on what you want from the map. I'd like a map to look good when using it and I don't think OSMand achieves that. But that's personal taste.. Editing it I actually prefer Carto or even the raw import in JOSM.

[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Sure. But I like OsmAnd because I can tell very fast which are major roads and which aren't (and driving in a big city you don't know it can be useful).

[–] Goldmaster@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] beta_tester@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably Goldmaster is talking about the film Tron Legacy

[–] Goldmaster@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That is correct, there was a webpage that could transform a map into something like tron

[–] eeleech@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I like the default OSM carto style, however as an everyday map while walking I mostly use Streetcomplete (or sometimes everydoor) as I like the ability to make edits.

[–] Pleat1752@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I use Organic Maps for daily use, and OSMAnd for outdoors activities like hiking etc. The added info and features in OSMAnd are indispensable for outdoors use.

[–] JohnDumpling@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I absolutely love CyclOSM. It's great for bike commuting, as it differentiates between separated cycle paths and cycle lanes, shows one-way streets that allow opposite bicycle traffic, good/bad surface quality, 20 and 30 km/h streets and bike stands.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

CyclOSM 99% of the time.