this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
501 points (97.4% liked)

Data is Beautiful

4867 readers
52 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 151 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Shoutout to the spike in women drinking when Trump got elected

Correlation is not causation, but...

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The election was 15-16. Spike happened 14-15. Wondering if it was a methodology change to jump that much in 1 year?

Also fuck me but that was already 10 years ago. Was trying to recall if there was maybe some kind of viral social media thing that might have happened in 2014.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Robin Williams killed himself and Bill Cosby was arrested.

[–] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The text is to the left on '15; zoom in and compare the circles to the year. It was a 15-16 jump according to the dots.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 112 points 2 months ago

Obligatory NYT headline: "Alcohol poisoning used to be a time honoured pasttime in this small town, but Millennial woke mob took it all away."

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I think at least part of it is due to weed. Both it being legalized and being more popular than it's ever been in non-legal states. At least for me, smoking weed kills my desire to drink nearly as much. Usually at parties or just hang outs it starts off with a beer or mixed drink or three, then someone breaks out the weed and suddenly I'm nursing my fourth drink for an hour.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Would we not expect sudden changes then? This is a steady decline, not indicating any sudden changes in laws or anything.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Weed legalization hasn't been sudden though. It's progressed from medical to decriminalized to legal state by excruciating state.

As this graph is national, it makes sense that there wouldn't be a cliff because there's no particular date when we could say weed became legal.

Still not legal in any way here in texasss, and I assume we'll be the very last of the last to do so. But even here, it's so easily accessible that a good number of younger people I know tell me they prefer weed to alcohol. In legal states, that tendency must be much higher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Legalization efforts have been piecemeal throughout the country, and still less than half the states have direct recreational access. I'm sure it's a factor, but until we have federal recreational legalization, we should see a downward trend instead of a drop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Atrichum@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I'm shocked there's no bump in 2020-2021. Many people I know, myself included, started drinking so much more during the pandemic.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These are also self reported numbers.

I know I wasn’t telling people how much I was drinking during the pandemic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FryHyde@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago

Also how are we defining "binge" drinking

[–] WanakaTree@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

I found people went one of two ways. I know plenty of people who drank more, but also plenty of people (myself included) who basically went cold turkey for two years. I don't enjoy drinking by myself so I didn't

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lugal@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It went from 50% to 30% which is less but the scale makes you feel it is much lower

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, graphs that are cut off is misleading graphs 101.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes you just have to trust the audience to be literate. A 20% drop is very significant, it's not like they're trying to make a .5% decline look like the Temperance movement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah and also its a decline in male binge drinking. Female hasn't really changed after a short term uptick.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I enjoy being intoxicated all day and not having a raging headache the day(s) after. Weed 4 Life!

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sayig drinking is fine, but you sound like you're dehydrated. If you can stomach water whilr drinking it reduces the negative effects

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The post was about binge drinking, which is a specific kind of "drinking"? I was comparing the differences between "binging" both drugs and the effects they cause after the fact.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

I gotta disagree here. What qualifies as a "binge" to a scientist and, say, a university student (or even an adult that occasionally drinks) are quite different things. You can science "binge" with like 3 or 5 drinks in a night with no ill effect at all by being sure to drink water or mixing with water, you just can't do it in 20 mins before bed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It looks more like the correct headline is binge drinking among men drops to the same level as women's binge drinking. The red line ends very close to where it starts.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

That's a very good point.

[–] alphapuggle@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm in the 18-25 demographic. I don't binge drink cuz tummy hurt :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Now do the UK.

Would be interesting to compare and contrast with a country that doesn't have legal weed

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dunno about the rest of the UK but here in Scotland £100 is s night out

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

In Manchester here, pretty much the same if you include transport and a kebab.

More like £150-200 if you want to drink nice and get mortal

[–] captaincoupi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I work with students a lot in the UK, and there has been a real shift in attitudes towards alcohol. Yes, they will still go out drinking, but no where near the extent previous generations have. Part of it will be that the government paid for my and my predecessors education, and even given adjustments for timescale, booze was sooooo much cheaper then than now.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a non-drinker that seems like a lot, OTOH, I have spent a lot on liquor for cooking so...

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’s depends if that’s from a store or a bar/restaurant. You can spend $100 on drinks at one dinner in NY if you’re taking someone out. Two people at $8-$15 a drink plus tip adds up fast.

[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What happened to the women in '15/'16 lol

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Binge drinking in celebration of first female president. Then binge drinking because Trump became president instead?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't live in a civilized state with legal weed, but I can get the hemp derived delta 9 gummies at any smoke shop, and they do a damn fine job (until Ken Paxton gets a hard-on for criminalizing them anyway)

Since I've had easy access to cannabis that I don't have to smoke, my desire to drink has plummeted.

I'm not gonna tell you that I've quit drinking. I'm not even gonna tell you that I've quit binge drinking.

But I am gonna tell you that I was once that guy who centered his entire existence on "when can I start drinking?"

Today, without any interventions, without any criminal charges, without any AA, without any conscious decision, I've somehow become entirely indifferent to alcohol.

I'll buy a twelve pack of beer here and there or a bottle of whiskey. Used to be either would be gone the next day. Now it'll take months (plural) to get through either one.

Downside: I've been a whole lot less social without the lubrication of alcohol. Weed doesn't make me social. It puts me to sleep.

Upside: I've pretty much ceased all alcohol related bad decisions. No more sorting through texts from the previous night or having to apologize.

Really big upside: No hangovers

Young people don't have my decades of experiences to arrive where I am today. Seems like they've found the equilibrium without first having to pay to price of alcohol consequences, and good for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is that vos everyones too busy trying to feed themselves they can't afford to get drunk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The scale of the graph is a bit misleading though.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

... what's wrong with the scale?

E: Apparently people just going through life looking at graphs ignoring everything on the graphs except LINE GO DOWN AND UP!!!

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's only showing the range from 60% to 30%, which makes the 20% drop in male binge drinking rates look more like an ~80% drop to near-zero unless you pay close attention to the scale.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

... how is a linear scaled graph on both the X and Y axis misleading when the point of the graph is to show change over time and percentage within a small range of about 25% - 55%? The extra 70% is useless.

A Y axis graph going from 0 to 100 results in a squashed graph that's hard to read.

Do you just read graphs without looking at the scale or something? It literally has the data points listed on each fucking dot FFS lol.

There is literally, not even metaphorically, nothing misleading about this graph.

Both of you quit using that word. It does not mean what you think it means.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There's apparently a similar story for the amount of sex younger people are having. I've always attributed the story to the internet and social media. IE, Younger people are just getting their "fix" from and are addicted to something else and aren't bored in the same way older generations were when they were young.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That would fit. Trend lines start dropping around the time that smart phones really started to be good and smartphone use actually become a viable passtime

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mastod0n@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Now add other drugs to the chart

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

Average of $105/month, that's much.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I wonder how much of a role palate refinement is for this trend. For example: Starbucks, for as terrible as their coffee is, did a lot to elevate the overall regard of coffee; bean juice was no longer just a bitter stew we tolerated to get our caffeine fix. Starbucks broke trail for craft coffee roasting more general popularity.

Could it be the same with alcoholic beverages? I used to think Maker's Mark was the best bourbon going. Now I know better, but so many of the craft bourbons are expensive or just plain hard to find. Ditto for my favorite hazy IPAs. Why binge drink the good stuff when your palate is going to be wrecked after three beers? And since I'm not going to drink swill, welp, guess I'm not going to get drunk tonight!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It looks like the collapse is due to men alone, which is interesting that it is only targeting one gender.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

If the difference is switching to cannabis, men do tend to be heavier users.

(Side note: one article I saw while looking for this referred to it as the "grass ceiling" lol)

load more comments (2 replies)

What’s with the spike for females? Wonder if it was political.

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

This graph is quite confusing and not beautiful. Months? Years? The words and numbers font correlate.

load more comments
view more: next ›