this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
550 points (98.9% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

4175 readers
1 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 97 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Does Google not currently have an anti trust lawsuit going on? Fine addition of them abusing their quasi monopoly position. But maybe they want to use this as argument "look people could just get it from fdroid" or something like that. IANAL

BTW does removal mean phones with enabled google protect will ask users to uninstall the app? I have this "feature" disabled.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

play protect sucks, ye. I think I might just go for f-droid only for my next phone.

I'll lose tiktok, but whatever

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Fuck tiktok

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's the Aurora Store on F-Droid that lets you install apps from Google's store without giving any data/account info to Google. Works pretty well!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Solution: don't install it from the Google Play Store. F-Droid and Obtainium exist.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is a workaround for tech savvy people, but pretty far from the point here. This move is bad for the community and bad for the app. Play Store brings orders of magnitude more exposure and users

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Android Auto won't work that way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 71 points 2 months ago (2 children)

On the bright side I had never heard of this app. So thanks I'm checking it out now

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's probably the best of the free and open source maps. I use it almost every day.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It is also apparently a threat to Google. If Google fears it then it must be solid. (Spoiler: it is as I use it)

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Basically Osmand mini. Simple and not much settings but good enough defaults.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 60 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This means I want to install organic maps now.

Update: I like it, it got us home quicker than google yesterday. And the route was less boring

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 56 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn, that means Google sees Organic maps as a threat. It is crazy how good it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, at least now Google won't try to update the app I installed through F-Droid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 months ago
[–] throws_lemy@lemmy.nz 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's one of the reasons why we need to breaking up google. They use gapps and play store to control the android ecosystem.

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Organic Maps is also available via https://accrescent.app/ which is developed by a GrapheneOS community member and even hosted in the GrapheneOS App Store.

Accrescent is a private and secure Android app store built with modern features in mind. It aims to provide a developer-friendly platform and pleasant user experience while enforcing modern security and privacy practices and offering robust validity guarantees for installed apps.

Accrescent comes from within the GrapheneOS community and we're collaborating together.

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/112821386750410102

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A grapheneos community member is just a random person

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

A grapheneos community member is just a random person

A random person that is mentioned specifically by the official GrapheneOS account, not to mention that GrapheneOS has said Accrescent is their recommended app store above F-Droid. Maybe Accrescent dev is not a GrapheneOS core dev, but still a step up, with more credibility, than just "a random person."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any info what the exact problem they had was? Can you search for brothels in that app or what? (I remember you can in OsmAnd)

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

There's nothing you can find in open street maps that is not also going to have an equivalent in Google maps. There's no messaging capability in the app. There aren't even photos, except if you link it with Wikipedia. I can't think of a single reason why this would get flagged, even accidentally.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well some Wikipedia articles could be construed as not appropriate for kids if you’re dead set on removing the app.

I’m thinking of things like Auschwitz or Hiroshima or the Twin Towers where content could be objectionable for children, but also that’s a terrible argument because it’s Wikipedia and it’s a fantastic educational resource.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia has images of nude humans in articles about sexuality and genitals, so that would be a possible reason there; not applicable to OSM.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I literally downloaded this two days ago. Wtf

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 months ago

Get Organic Maps from F-Droid. Start taking power away from Google. It's in your own hands.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fuck pokemon go all my homies play streetcomplete

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 6 points 2 months ago

I recently started using it and screw you all for recommending it. My walks take like twice as long now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nickb333@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago

Likewise, new android user and it's far easier than OSM in my Vivaldi browser.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As much as I love fdroid and I love to be in a community where this recommendation is made repeatedly, the announcement suggests to download from https://cdn.organicmaps.app/apk/OrganicMaps-24081605-GooglePlay.apk while they appeal. From the way they wrote the announcement, I understand Android Auto won't work with the fdroid version.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 8 points 2 months ago

I'm angry that Google prevents sideloaded apps from running on Android Auto. I think this is against the recent EU laws about gatekeepers.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

That's funny I just installed it yesterday but decided to use f-droid instead. Going to be my default going forward.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's back up now. It seems to have been a mistake to block it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nickb333@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Google's anticompetitive practices are at it again.

[–] LeLachs@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

So, if they make it 18+, they would be fine? (not that this is a solution)

[–] Slayerx@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Someone still uses Google software? Poor souls...

load more comments
view more: next ›