this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
550 points (98.9% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

4175 readers
25 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any info what the exact problem they had was? Can you search for brothels in that app or what? (I remember you can in OsmAnd)

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

There's nothing you can find in open street maps that is not also going to have an equivalent in Google maps. There's no messaging capability in the app. There aren't even photos, except if you link it with Wikipedia. I can't think of a single reason why this would get flagged, even accidentally.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well some Wikipedia articles could be construed as not appropriate for kids if you’re dead set on removing the app.

I’m thinking of things like Auschwitz or Hiroshima or the Twin Towers where content could be objectionable for children, but also that’s a terrible argument because it’s Wikipedia and it’s a fantastic educational resource.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia has images of nude humans in articles about sexuality and genitals, so that would be a possible reason there; not applicable to OSM.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Good point, that too, though that would presumably be harder to find exclusively through the app since I assume the linked articles are primarily about locations / landmarks

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There definitely is data in OSM that isn't in Google Maps, that is what makes OSM so great! :D

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Absolutely true. I just updated a neighborhood area yesterday that is completely wrong in Google. I didn't mean to imply that it's identical, just comparable in terms of content.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

But Wikipedia app is on the Google store... I won't pretend to understand the logic of the indefensible.