this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
-105 points (8.0% liked)

politics

18852 readers
5242 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the Biden White House’s greatest achievements, from the perspective of its staffers, if not necessarily the country, has been to deny the press the kind of juicy leaks that were constant under Donald Trump and frequent under his predecessors. Save for a very narrow period of time, that is, when there was a push to force an aging president toward the exits: Then and only then we got a drip-drip-drip of fascinating inside information.

For instance, we learned that Biden hadn’t held a full cabinet meeting since last October and that his handlers expected scripted questions from his cabinet officials. We learned that his capacities peak between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. and diminish outside that six-hour window. We learned that congressional Democrats, liberal donors and some journalists all had exposure to Biden’s decline that they didn’t discuss publicly until the debacle of the June debate. We learned that none other than Hunter Biden was acting as a close adviser to his father in the crucial days after that debate.

We even learned that from early in his presidency, the first lady’s closest aides worked to shield her husband from the staff that serves the first family in its living quarters, even as the aides themselves were given unusual access to the residence — as though it were essential to create a cocoon of loyalty and silence around the nation’s chief executive even when he isn’t on the job.

These are all interesting and pertinent facts about the man who officially leads the United States in a time of global danger — and they have not ceased to be pertinent because that president is no longer running for re-election.

(...)

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/10/opinion/joe-biden-president.html?unlocked_article_code=1.CE4.0hyL.9CNFJAmhWmk2&smid=url-share

https://archive.is/u2JyP

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Non-fan-fiction. Ghosted by Trump, sounds like the ramblings from the 90 minute campaign speech the media covered (without equal time for his rivals)

The New York Enquirer.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (18 children)

14th_cylon and return2ozma just need to hang out at this point. It's getting awkward.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Well damn, I'm not voting for him again! Lol

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago

This is the biggest pile of insinuating bullshit based on nothing since Clinton's email "scandal" in 2016. The NYT was all over that, too!

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Oh, no! Someone is tired if they are asked to work outside of normal working hours, friends and co-workers didn't talk smack behind his back, and he has a close relationship with his only son! And worst of all, the first lady's staff - who historically ran the more mundane custodial functions in the White House - were given access to the White House! And people hand picked by the first lady were loyal to her?

Wow, this is bad guys. Biden is acting like a normal person and not a drama queen who hires disloyal sycophants who bad mouth him behind his back!

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

Wow the NYT has lost its mind with this garbage.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Sure Jan. /s

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I woke up this morning and I thought ‘what would Hunter do?’

This is a very fair and unbiased article, thanks for sharing!

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In this fiction, Hunter is his closest advisor!

That'll be $3.50, please.