this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
254 points (99.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
3615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Idaho State Police’s sexual assault nurse coordinator told Idaho Reports that the new law prevents law enforcement from administering rape kits to minors without parental permission. 

SB 1329’s legal impact was evident in recently revamped healthcare statements issued by St. Mary’s Health and Clearwater Valley Health, Terry Reilly Health Services and a cohort of other providers making it clear that minors will not be offered non-emergency care without parental permission.  

Children were already not allowed to receive medical care without parental permission in the majority of cases before the passage of SB 1329 according to the American Medical Association, but exceptions for emergency and sexual healthcare are in place in several states including Washington.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 54 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know people that were assaulted by their parents, or those protected by their parents. This is tragic. It guts me to think about it.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 3 months ago

Repubs will harm anyone for the sake of flexing power. Especially those with no power of their own. This is really bad.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fucking sickening. As if parents are never the abusers. Someone ought to find the names and faces of everyone who pushed this bill forward and plaster them on billboards all across Idaho with the tagline "Defenders of Incest".

From the text of the bill:

(4) Subsection (3) of this section shall not apply, and a health care provider may authorize or furnish a health care service without obtaining the informed consent of the minor child's parent, if: (a) A parent of the minor child has given blanket consent authorizing the health care provider to furnish the health care service; or (b) The health care provider reasonably determines that a medical emergency exists and: (i) Furnishing the health care service is necessary in order to prevent death or imminent, irreparable physical injury to the minor child; or (ii) After a reasonably diligent effort, the health care provider cannot locate or contact a parent of the minor child and the minor child's life or health would be seriously endangered by further delay in the furnishing of health care services.

I fail to see how a sexually-assaulted child doesn't qualify as a medical emergency, or how providing care wouldn't be considered "preventing imminent, irreparable physical injury". What the fuck is wrong with you, Idaho? Who do you think you are? Texas?

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

In many ways, Idaho is way worse than Texas.

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't know what's in a rape kit but I'm guessing that there might be something that could (with luck) prevent conception in a female child who's raped. Idaho Christofascist Republicans WANT rape victims who get pregnant as a result of the rape to be forced to carry the fetus to term. That's how they exercise power and control over women, and that's one of the main things that they get off on in life. This news post is absolutely repulsive but nothing surprises me about that Christofascist hellscape called Idaho anymore.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This is more about denying the state evidence of who assaulted the child. As one might do if the attacker were a family member that the parents wanted to protect, such as a brother or the father himself.

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand: how would prohibiting LE from "administering" a rape kit to a raped minor "deny the state evidence" of who did the raping. Wouldn't LE still know who the rapist was, independently of whatever medical care the victim received?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They wouldn't be able to collect semen. Can someone be prosecuted without that? Sure, but the rape kit would sure help. Especially if the family says it's all a lie.

Someone I know was flat out forced to recant what she had told a teacher. Getting a rape kit before someone can be forced to recant would be huge in a case like that.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

No, a "rape kit" is a colloquialism for the standard set of sexual assault documentation and medical care, which includes providing the victim contraception, presumably prophylaxis, documenting injuries to the victim, cataloguing evidence on the victim's body, and other things.

A health professional could go into more detail or correct me, this is what I know from conversation.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

It also helps identify the assailant. And since Christians largely think that they can fuck kids in the name of god, clearly ”evidence” is something they would like to prevent.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago

American Medical Association (AMA) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for American Medical Association (AMA):

MBFC: Pro-Science - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/confidential-health-care-minors
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support