this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
349 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3921 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 107 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It would be better if they could forget the hate that he convinced them of having.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, my sweet summer child.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You can go bless your own heart using southern insults.

I'm an old European man, but I have not conceded the belief that we can make the world a better place using positive reinforcement or just by fucking trying.

I beg of you not to give in to apathy for lulz. It's not funny.

If the democrats win, you will need to embrace your fellow countrymen and get them on your team. Alienating them like the meme suggests is only going to reinforce their wrong beliefs.

Okay, that's my pep-talk. A more affable way of putting it: Yo, you gotta live those people, make the best of it.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I should have been clearer.

... the hate that he convinced them of having.

They already had that hate, all primed and ready to vote for the person who would authorize them to use it.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Fair point.

I actually had the same thought before posting, but decided that it was more relevant to describe my point of view on the solution rather than the problem.

The conservative hatred is still your problem to solve, because Trump is sure as fuck not taking the issue along into the grave when he dies.

In my opinion it's best solved by getting in dialogue with the idiots and allowing them to change their minds instead of holding a grudge against them and excluding them. I acknowledge that it is naïve but I want to believe that anyone can be become smarter, even republican voters. Excluding them won't work, because they already feel left out of what they call the "elite", which is really their term for anyone who didn't flunk out of school.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I want to believe that anyone can be become smarter, even republican voters.

Don't get me wrong. I firmly believe that there has to be a path to redemption. That path exists. All anyone who is missing the point has to do is think about literally anyone besides themselves. I can't make anyone do that. That is not, and cannot, be my problem to solve.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No one can ever make anyone do or learn anything. That's the teachers curse. Understanding only comes when a person themselves understands it themselves.

The best you can do is to keep questioning them until they at least think about it, and that's all I ask you to consider doing.

Someone tells racist shit? Ask them why?
Your uncle doesn't want universal healthcare? Ask him why?
You mother doesn't want student loans forgiven? Ask her why?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because it'll make them think about it, and them thinking is what is needed.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not interested in having, for example, a racist defend their racism to me. Nor am I interested in giving them the opportunity to firm up their own wrong-headed conceptions through the action of defending them.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is the point. Nobody can defend racism. Do not sit in silent agreement, question it instead.

You will hear a lot of garbage, but you don't have to agree, just listen and ask.

They'll come back with all kinds of excuses or argumens.. "I feel like.." , "I've heard that everyone says" or point to sources of statementd etc..

You can question all of it, until they start questioning themselves why they're listening to those sources in the first place. Again, don't push it, just let them come back with whatever argument they've found and then question it. If you do it in a civil way, they'll eventually start thinking or asking for your opinion.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I refer you to my previous comment.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 3 months ago

Answering the last part of your previous comment:

They will only firm up their own opinion if you start arguing.

As soon as you say "you're wrong because ABC and D argument", *that's when they dig into their opinion and make up reasoning to protect their view.

Questioning doesn't do that. It's a fine way to allow people to reason themselves out of the hole the dug into.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

you will need to embrace your fellow countrymen and get them on your team

That assumes they want us to embrace them or be on our team. It's pretty clear they don't.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ahh. Give it try. Whenever they say something,njust ask them why they think that. Don't argue, don't push, just ask. Eventually they'll think about it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Someone else will have to do that. I don't have enough patience, and I'm sure their idiocy will give me a migraine.

Maybe, maybe if they come to me asking to find common ground I'd listen. But I'm not wasting what little time I have on this planet throwing pearls before swine.

[–] aniki@lemmings.world 3 points 3 months ago

🙏

This right here. Life is too short to fuck around with fascists and nazis. 24 hours isn't enough.

[–] aniki@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

Nah. I'm old and tired and don't care if those chuckle fucks hate me. I'll just pretend that their whole little pathetic world doesn't exist.

[–] Junkhead 3 points 3 months ago

nah id rather not embrace awful bigots they can fix their own fucking hearts.

[–] Sir_packsalot2@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Impeached felon. Rapist. Taitor. Thief. Liar. Embarrassment. And yet you think he's president

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

he doesnt know whats in the constitution, nor does he care.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Weird, old felon.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago

Anyone else hope he loses his shit and erupts into a gag order breaking tirade?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Conversation:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theconversation.com/despite-donald-trumps-claims-his-gag-order-holds-up-against-the-constitution-233762
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support