this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
85 points (100.0% liked)

News

23267 readers
4644 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gone is the bullhorn. Instead, New York City emergency management officials have turned high-tech, using drones to warn residents about potential threatening weather.

With a buzzing sound in the background, a drone equipped with a loudspeaker flies over homes warning people who live in basement or ground-floor apartments about impending heavy rains.

“Be prepared to leave your location,” said the voice from the sky in footage released Tuesday by the city’s emergency management agency. “If flooding occurs, do not hesitate.”

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

“A new life awaits you in the off-world colonies - the chance to begin again in a golden land of opportunity and adventure.”

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Is the existing emergency alert system not sufficient? It already activates TV, radio, and cell phones.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not to mention, what's wrong with plain old sirens on poles? I refuse to believe that drones are somehow cheaper to buy/operate/maintain.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

what’s wrong with plain old sirens on poles?

No cameras on them and they don't normalize the idea of police drones buzzing around your neighborhood.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

That is a very good point.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In Dallas, our sirens don't mean tornado; they mean go indoors to avoid large hail or high winds. It's crazy confusing for people who don't know, go hide in their bathrooms, and then get pissed off when there's no tornado. An alternate/backup method would be good (voice or different siren?) but I'm not sure a drone can tolerate a severe weather situation.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

because if you set off a siren like that, all of the Orthodox Jews will assume its the Sabbath and run home.

see, they already do this every Friday just before sundown to mark the beginning of the Sabbath, so....

edit: this may just be limited to Williamsburg/Bed-Stuy

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My tinfoil hat theory is that Drones are far better at mass surveillance than current emergency alert systems, so while the advantage over the existing emergency alert system is probably negligible - it opens the door for people accepting having drones everywhere and constantly overhead which is the real goal.

For a second layer of tinfoil, having a strong drone presence (production, infrastructure, technology) in the economy seems like it will be very useful for future wars. Whoever has the largest and smartest swarm wins

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For slightly less tinfoil haberdashery, it could be used to more rapidly locate people during a weather disaster, identify what areas are most heavily impacted in real-time, and redirect emergency services in case of, say, debris blocking a road.

This is of course assuming it's not the cheapest shit the highest bidder offers (which it probably will be) that disintegrates during a light rain.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

No. You need the government flying machines outside your window to let you know about your freedoms.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

We can assume an amount of people in NYC that have no access to any of those.

It's not a bad supplement to existing systems.

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

We’re really bringing the most dystopian science fiction to life, aren’t we? Does art imitate life or…?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Warning people that are in danger from incoming dangerous weather seems like a good idea to me. We need to stop fucking up the climate to reduce the amount of dangerous weather, yes, but it's sensible to protect people from it until we do that (and of course, even if we never did anything to change the climate, sometimes it would still be dangerous)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think the worry here is that if they are already using drones to monitor weather, what else are they using drones to monitor?

I don't live anywhere near NYC, but I do know Adams was a cop, so I wouldn't trust him to just use city drones for helpful reasons.

[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Drones have been banned in the city for years. Iirc the city uses anti-drone drones occasionally, but I’ve literally never seen one overhead, be it personal, commercial, or governmental.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you trust Adams enough that you think he'll care if his own government defies that ban if he feels it's necessary?

[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, but the point is if I see a drone I know it’s a government drone and not just some hobbyist. The ban already doesn’t apply to the government, hence the weather warning drones and anti-drone drones.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I was talking about government ones to begin with.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

I'm sure the storm awareness drones flying in storm weather will never cause any issues.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Why? Were sharpies not working?