this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
850 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2270 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Who are these brain dead weirdo losers sitting around online drawing arrows on someone's minor man boobage?

Honestly this headline and comments alone make me feel so out of touch. Like I'll go online. And yeah I'll call someone a dumbass if they're saying dumbass things. And yeah it's not that civil I suppose, but what are these weird ass people doing?

Why can't they sit at home and play an MMO all day and not bother anyone? Why can't they watch daytime TV all day? No. They spend their time completely absorbed in the business and private affairs of strangers and they think it has anything to do with policy or politics. These people could be dismissed as unserious lunatics if the shit they were spouting and things they were doing weren't so dangerous and violent.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

No. His MURDER of a person was in a public place, he didn't have a carry permit, was not the owner of the firearm used because he was too young to be a registered owner, and he transferred said weapon across state lines.

So, No...what he did was not legal. He just got off because of the jury. Big fucking difference, asshole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dreamless4561@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 months ago
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

i will say, for how stupid i think this kid is, i will say this is pretty based.

Now, don't make me eat my words and take this back as soon as trump calls you stinky and gross.

[–] Shatpoz1288@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Nobody cares about this dude tbh 😂

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 4 months ago

The far-right group Q-ANON went a step further, saying that he was secretly a transgender psy-op and crisis actor in the Sandy Hook shooting.

Qanon isn't an organized group. It's a bunch of internet shitheads believing in culty bullshit. Don't give it any more status than it deserves.

Let's recommend some books:

Trust the Plan: The Rise of QAnon and the Conspiracy That Unhinged America

The Quiet Damage: QAnon and the Destruction of the American Family

It Came from Something Awful: How a Toxic Troll Army Accidentally Memed Donald Trump into Office

Culture Warlords: My Journey Into the Dark Web of White Supremacy

After the Fact?: The Truth about Fake News

Only the first two are explicitly about Qanon. But they all work together as a theme.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago

There should be some kind of club "called transgender by people I criticised".

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

You’re irrelevant, Rittenhouse. Siddown.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

That is truly hilarious.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago

Well now Rittenhouse has done it. He has nowhere to go, no one to be with.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›