this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37692 readers
353 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

The U.S. Department of Justice is suing TikTok for allegedly letting kids under 13 make accounts without their parents’ permission and collecting “extensive data” on them, in violation of US child privacy law.

The DOJ claims that TikTok knowingly let kids onto its platform through its “Kids Mode,” collected their information, and failed to delete their accounts at their parents’ requests, in violation of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). When a kid under 13 entered their age on the app, they’d be prompted to enter a username, which doesn’t contain personal information, and it would create a Kids Mode account for the user. But the app wouldn’t notify parents or get their consent. Kids can’t upload videos in that mode, but they can view videos; the DOJ alleges that TikTok collected some personal information on them as part of this process, like unique device identifiers and IP addresses.

The lawsuit alleges that TikTok’s age-gating techniques “are deficient in multiple ways.” Under an earlier practice, TikTok would let users restart the account creation process even if they’d originally entered a birthday showing they’re under 13, according to the complaint. TikTok also used to let users log in through Instagram or Google, which would categorize the accounts as “age unknown,” the DOJ alleges.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe just protect everyone's right to privacy?

Their enforcement mechanism ensure the opposite.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

COPPA is a joke sometimes, they don't really protect and like other American orgs it probably is lobbied.

The best case would be to protect everyone's privacy, not just the children OR teens. And if they wanted to help then they would've outlined other orgs like Facebook - but that's an American org.

[–] tardigrada@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago

@sleen@lemmy.zip

And if they wanted to help then they would've outlined other orgs like Facebook - but that's an American org.

Last year, 40 or so U.S. states filed a lawsuit against Meta over children's protection, and that is by far not the only one, just fyi.

[–] vinniep@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago

The best case would be to protect everyone’s privacy, not just the children OR teens

The difference is that an adult can consent to having their data collected by these companies, making the investigation and enforcement a more nuanced endeavor. A child cannot, so it all becomes far more straight forward and easier to go after the offending companies.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Now do Facebook/Instagram.

[–] tardigrada@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

See my.other comment in this thread and here

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Spoiler: The other comment says nothing about the justice department attacking facebook/instagram.

[–] tardigrada@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Spoiler: Your and SaltySalamander's comment say nothing about the current lawsuit against TikTok which is the topic here.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

How about just classify data by the minimum security requirements you need to meet to hold a license to collect it?