this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1147 points (97.6% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2189 readers
55 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 351 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Do you guys remember back when Elon insisted he was a Free Speech Absolutist? How he wanted to ensure nobody was censored on Twitter? That shit just gets funnier every day.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 186 points 3 months ago (3 children)

His "clarification" was great too.

“By ‘free speech,’ I simply mean that which matches the law. I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law. If people want less free speech, they will ask government to pass laws to that effect. Therefore, going beyond the law is contrary to the will of the people.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/28/elon-musk-doesnt-understand-free-speech-or-twitter-at-all

So, you know, North Korea's idea of "free speech" is just fine with him.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 87 points 3 months ago

considering he unbanned an account that reposted csam I think he doesnt gaf about the law

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

He probably rationalizes it by thinking of Twitter as his personal publishing platform, thus all speech on it is subject to his editorial control. To take away his editorial control would be to violate his free speech rights in his eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 227 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

If that’s an actual photo from today then I doubt he was grazed much because I skinned my knee biking the day before his rally. I’ve still got a giant scab there.

Also Pete Souza isn’t just anyone. He’s a former director of the White House photo office.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 121 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It probably means he's on blood thinners. You'll bleed like you cut an artery even with a tiny nick.

So he probably had a tiny cut that just bleed a lot because of blood thinners.

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 42 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Could be, but then blood thinners also make the wound heal longer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

My thoughts exactly. I was on them for a time and I'd bleed FOREVER if I cut myself shaving. That's when I learned about styptic pencils and alum blocks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 182 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Journalists need to stop fucking using Twitter for fucks sake.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hard to get an audience if you leave big tech, Twitter included

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nl4real@lemmy.world 163 points 3 months ago (8 children)

When are people actually going to leave that hellsite in meaningful numbers?

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 90 points 3 months ago (18 children)

When they don't also deepthroat Netflix after they banned password sharing. All the optimistic people, me included, said "oh this will make a huge dent in Netflix what a stupid move." But they read the room like a hawk.

People swallowed the hook and signed up in huge numbers. https://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-password-sharing-crackdown-worked-how-to-increase-subscription-streaming-2024-1

The West has created the perfect neutered, obedient consumers who will drink whatever coolade they are given. Until we have enough people who are willing to challenge convenience and stop bowing at the altar of comfort, we will have no meaningful change.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 months ago (18 children)

You even got people on the left saying "I won't vote for the less bad politician unless he makes me excited to vote". When did everyone get so selfish?

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 131 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (18 children)

Hang on, ~~this guy~~ the AP seriously took a picture where there is no injury to his ear? What was all the blood then? This one needs independent corroboration.

[–] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 170 points 3 months ago (4 children)

2 weeks is plenty of time for a shallow, skin-only graze to heal. And ear cuts can bleed a ton.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ears, scalp, cuticles… all places that bleed like crazy.

[–] Snowyday@startrek.website 30 points 3 months ago

Especially when you’re on blood thinners

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

In addition, a competent plastic surgeon would likely make it look like it had never happened. I hope he goes to jail for the crimes he committed, but do people really expect him to wear an ear diaper the rest of his life?

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I thought he would milk it until the election somehow. We can't be right all the time I guess!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 64 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When an octopus gets frightened it releases ink to confuse predators. Due to his love of hamburgers Donnie releases catsup.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Do not bring us cephalopods into this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 79 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Everyone needs to chill out about this ear thing. It's amazing what can be covered with a little bit of makeup. As much as I detest the man, I can see why he wouldn't want to walk around with a visible ear cut. Women cover zits and blemishes with makeup as a matter of course. Do you think the orange douchewipe wants the focus on his ear? All presidents (and "presidents") have makeup up people, and their job is to cover this kind of shit up and make the person look as flawless as possible.

Let's leave the conspiracy theories to the conservatards.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 88 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Do you think the orange douchewipe wants the focus on his ear?

I mean, yeah, I kinda do. I expected him to milk the assassination attempt for all it's worth, and I don't think that makes me a conspiracy theorist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VoterFrog@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

Knowing how Trump has played up his assassination attempt at every opportunity.... He absolutely would want to bring attention to any damage to his ear.

I don't really care one way or another about whatever drama is going on about his ear. I'm just saying, I don't think he'd choose to use makeup to cover up any scars on his ear.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It’s amazing what can be covered with a little bit of makeup.

Because Trump is known for using a "little bit" of makeup. If he was using makeup on his ear, it would be to make it look worse, not to cover it up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago (11 children)

And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

THIS SHIT ISN'T FUNNY ANYMORE

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

It's so on-the-nose that I don't even Trump is the parody anymore, it's evangelical Christianity that's the real parody. A group of folks who make a story about a socialist day laborer from the Middle East and use it to justify white supremacy, unfettered capitalism, and wealth as a measure of God's love falling in line behind a cartoonishly accurate representation the "bad guy" in their book...exactly like their book said they would.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 49 points 3 months ago

I'm assuming all those free-speech nuts are really going after Musk for doing this right?

I'm joking, we all know it's just free-speech for the things they agree with ...

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we revoke his government contracts now?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

I mean, they didn't even do that when he literally fucked up a Ukrainian operation against Russia.

Money rules this country. It stopped being a democratic republic a long time ago.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (38 children)

Question: As this is no longer a neutral platform, what would be the legal implications? Is Twitter still a neutral carrier (or whatever the proper term is) and enjoys far-reaching legal protections for this?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as a "neutral carrier" for social media. It's a made-up concept used to pretend that a social media site isn't allowed to be partisan.

There are zero legal ramifications for making Twitter as partisan as musk wants.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 27 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Funny how the "free speech" guy bought Twitter and made it more biased and authoritarian than it has ever been.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It would be pretty funny if the photographer just mirrored the image before uploading it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

Elon Goebbels really seems to be working hard on this one.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Umm his last insta post was two days ago. Can someone ummm check on him?

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Last time I saw ‘em, he said something about hanging out with his buddy at Boeing.

I’m sure everything’s fine, they’re prolly just messin with planes & stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

So it was just a glass shard from the teleprompter...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, so that bullet BARELY clipped him? And he has all those pictures of him trying to act heroic?

Veterans (AKA "suckers and losers" according to Trump) must hate this guy...

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (8 children)

No bullet touched him, it's not like in the movies, if a round had even grazed his ear it would have removed a nice chunk of it. Extremely fast objects don't slice you nice and cleanly.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 27 points 3 months ago (15 children)

They were saying it was most likely a piece of the teleprompter that nicked his ear.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›