Puberty blockers are reasonably safe and are a proven medical treatment for a problem, so why are they banned?
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
18 points (90.9% liked)
Pleasant Politics
215 readers
213 users here now
Politics without the jerks.
This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read !santabot@slrpnk.net for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.
Rules
Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.
All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.
No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
In one word I would say: transphobia.
For more info, I've edited the post's description to include some relevant links.
Because being unique is scary and goes against conformism.
In the UK specifically, there are studies showing limited effectiveness (I don’t know how they define that) of puberty blockers, vs. transitioning later in life. So there’s this fear “what if a child changed themself as part of a fad”. Which is probably transphobic, but at least it’s nuanced a little bit.
They make some absurd definition probably.
Doubt this doornail will look the children he's murdering in the eye.
This is the same as banning chemo drugs if chemo was safer, less invasive, and needed by less people.