this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
765 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3157 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has issued a dire warning to her party about the chaos that could ensue if they succeed in pushing President Joe Biden off the ticket. And she criticized Democrats who’ve given off-the-record quotes that suggest the party has resigned itself to a second Trump term.

In an Instagram Live video on Thursday, Ocasio-Cortez warned liberals that a brokered convention could lead to chaos, in part because she says some of the Democratic “elites” who want Biden out also don’t want Vice President Kamala Harris as the nominee in his place. 

“If you think that is going to be an easy transition, I’m here to tell you that a huge amount of the donor class and these elites who are pushing for the president not to be the nominee also do not want to see the VP be the nominee,” she said. 

Ocasio-Cortez claimed none of the people she’s spoken with who are calling on Biden to drop out — including lawmakers and legal experts — have articulated a plan to swap out the nominee without minimizing the serious legal and procedural challenges that are likely to ensue. 

Ocasio-Cortez also highlighted the racial, ethnic and class divisions that appear to have formed between the majority of those pining to blow up the ticket — led mostly by white Democrats and media pundits — and those elected officials who feel they and their constituents have too much at stake to upend the process at this point and so are willing to do the work to re-elect Biden-Harris. She alluded to this cultural divide in her video when she spoke out against anonymous sources expressing a sense of fatalism on behalf of Democrats about what might happen if Biden remains on the ticket: 

What I will say is what upsets me is [Democrats] saying we will lose. For me, to a certain extent, I don’t care what name is on there. We are not losing. I don’t know about you, but my community does not have the option to lose. My community does not have the luxury of accepting loss in July of an election year. My people are the first ones deported. They’re the first ones put in Rikers. They’re the first ones whose families are killed by war.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 172 points 5 months ago (7 children)

AOC and Bernie are both saying this and I agree 110%. In all occasions. The most important thing is we all make a plan to go out and vote. Talk to other democrats and make sure they fight that demoralization and go out and vote. There is so much at stake with Project 2025 that I dont even care about these headlines anymore.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Agreed. She also pointed out that early voting ballots go out in September. A new campaign would have an eight week runway if it started now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 143 points 5 months ago (35 children)

This is a good fucking take, have to say. She very obviously knows what she's talking about extremely well, has the best interests of those she represents at heart, and knows how to express it all clearly for the average layperson. You don't get a lot of politicians of that caliber.

No wonder the Republicans hate her so much!

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 62 points 5 months ago (10 children)

I can’t understand the people who dislike her. My sisters don’t like her either and think she’s “dumb” but every time she speaks, she makes what seems to me to be well thought out, rational arguments.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because she's actually left and they know it. Most Democrats are centered left or even right.

[–] AnarchistArtificer 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I see a lot of people who hate her for not being left enough. Whilst I sympathise with that stance to an extent, from the perspective of someone in the UK, the US seems so shockingly right wing that I'm surprised that a figure like Ocasio-Cortez exists at all. That is to say that I wish America had more left wing politicians, but given the current lack, AOC is a refreshing presence.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 121 points 5 months ago (6 children)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 49 points 5 months ago

It'd be nice to have a competent candidate for once.

[–] SuzyQ@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Met her briefly at a Sanders campaign rally. Would vote for her in a heartbeat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 69 points 5 months ago (6 children)

She turned me around. I'm riding with Biden. I'm serious. I hope the Democrats don't fuck this up even more. If Kamala can't taker her rightful place without the donors get in the way then fuck them all. I'm voting for a mentally compromised candidate. I hate this system.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 67 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I trust AOCs judgement, although it might just be both options are equal as long as the party can commit to one. The worst possible outcome is non-commitment, as it's the worst of both worlds.

Stick with Biden, you rally 100% with a flawed candidate and highlight all the good he's done with a flawed Congress (a majority in name only on progressive issues). Can win if you don't repeat 2016 mistakes, which at this point I don't think we'll be taking the rust belt for granted.

Abandon Biden 100%, you quickly side with an obvious choice and build a campaign. Time isn't on your side but you aren't dealing with a much baggage. Can win if the big tent party can agree on things and rally behind the choice even if it's not their first choice. Kamala is boring but probably would be the pick with least resistance.

The problem is neither is happening, so you get Biden with sub-100% support and buying into the age narrative rather than pivoting to his strengths, which is very much a losing strategy. Those resigned to losing probably know this is our trajectory unless something big happens (e.g. Biden sheds the age narrative somehow or drops out leading to a clear successor.)

My hope? We get a 2016 surprise in our favor: polls say Trump wins 99% odds yet Biden pulls off an upset. Wouldn't that be sweet irony...

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 months ago (4 children)

My hope? We get a 2016 surprise in our favor: polls say Trump wins 99% odds yet Biden pulls off an upset. Wouldn't that be sweet irony...

The Trumpanzees are going to screech about the election being rigged regardless what happens, I'd rather not give them any extra ammo for people to take them seriously about it. I'd like to see Trump absolutely blown the fuck out with votes, I want a 98-2% split in favor of Biden. The only votes I want going toward Trump are Guilty votes from his jury.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 51 points 5 months ago (25 children)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

She ain't wrong.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

I'm willing to admit that I also wanted this situation sorted out and handled before now with someone energetic and capable of getting people excited to vote. I've since decided that this is a problem for the Democratic party to handle, not me. Their candidate could be Minnesota's very own dog mayor for all I fucking care.

[–] StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago (12 children)
[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Aging like milk implies that she isn't right about what she said.

Give it until November. If the Biden replacement wins by a landslide, then sure, it will age like milk.

Otherwise, so far, it's aging like fucking fine wine - and I'm not liking it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (13 children)

If Biden stays in and loses, AOC doesn't want centrists to blame the left. They will anyway.

If he stays in and wins, centrists will consider it a mandate to continue moving right from a position that includes Trump's border policy and genocide.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Fucking finally a progressive with some sense (I say this as a progressive myself).

We need to be real here, this isn't a fucking joke.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

‘Could lead to chaos’. Ma’am, that ship has sailed. When even high ranking party members openly doubt the president’s ability to get elected, much less actually lead, you’ve clearly lost control of the situation.

Will replacing Biden at this stage be easy? Of course not. But he shouldn’t have been in the Oval Office in the first place. Running a candidate this frail once was a gamble… doing it twice is suicidal.

Democrat leadership only has itself to blame for this predicament.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 months ago (4 children)

When I voted in the primary, there was one name on the ballot: Joe Biden. Anybody who thinks that was a free and fair election is on crack.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tiresia 29 points 5 months ago (7 children)

It's annoying that she put this on Instagram where there's no scrobble function, and she then spends so much time leading up to it.

For those not willing to sit around listening to off-the-cuff meandering, AOC's points:

  • Ohio requires political parties to submit their candidates' names before the Democratic convention. If the convention is contested, Democrats likely won't be able to vote there effectively.
  • AOC says that swing states might have enough legal ambiguity in the electoral code that Republicans can challenge any voting results, and then let it escalate to the Supreme Court who can throw out the Democratic result.
  • Democrats are divided on who would be the replacement candidate, with many of the people calling for Biden to step down opposing Harris as well.
  • The Biden/Harris campaign has $100M of campaign funding that will not be able to be transferred to another ticket. (Maybe it can be transferred to Harris? She mumbles a bit there).
  • Anecdotally, when AOC sat "in rooms with those people" that call for Biden to step down, they didn't seem to have a proposed game plan for any sort of replacement. This includes lawyers who ought to know whether this creates legal trouble and people in the legislature.
  • There is a risk that if the Democratic convention is contested, it won't be concluded before the deadline to submit the ticket in more states, which is two days after the scheduled end.
  • There are no candidates that poll way better than Biden.
  • Many mail-in votes can already be made in September or October. A new candidate would have to have a succesful campaign by that time.
  • Biden is systematically underestimated (by Democrats and fianciers?) in his ability to rally 'demographics typically not cared for'.
  • Biden does great with elderly people, which may not transfer to other Democrats.
  • Democrats opposing Biden seem to be mostly concerned about big donors, not popular support.
  • Democratic party members speaking anonymously to the press is both strategically stupid and undemocratic. They should have either spoken out publicly or kept it behind closed doors. The fact that they did may be why Biden is polling so bad.
  • Biden gets energized from having people around him, which was not the case for the debate with Trump.

My personal opinions:

  • With regards to Ohio, betting websites put the Republicans at 95% chance of winning the state, and Biden appears to have been trailing by 10 percentage points even before the debate. Losing Ohio only matters if you would have won Ohio with Biden, and that's questionable.
  • With regards to the Supreme court handing the election to Trump based on a bullshit legal ruling, it seems like AOC is making the dangerous and questionable assumption that the Supreme Court cares about the law, and that the outcome of these legal challenges will depend on technicalities rather than on whether they think they can practically succeed at the coup.
  • With regards to the $100M war chest, this seems to be cancelled out by her argument that Democrats opposing Trump are mostly concerned about donors. In 2020, Biden's election got $1 billion in funding while on May 9th, Biden had raked in $170M according to this website. So with upwards of $700M of donations left to collect, a 14% decrease in donations would mean Biden has less money to work with than other candidates.
  • With regards to other candidates not doing much better, it seems impressive that they are polling better than Biden even with Biden running a massive election campaign and having spent a hundred million dollars in ads already. I would expect the gap to widen if those other candidates actually start trying to win the election as much as Biden is.
  • With regards to the votes in September and October, with regards to the elderly and demographics typically not cared for and popular support, these all seem to be cancelled out by the polls.
  • With regards to the Democrat backchannels, the damage is done. It's fair that she's mad about it, but it doesn't affect future decisions.
  • With regards to Biden's energy, either this doesn't explain the Zelensky-Putin gaffe, or it's kind of irrelevant. Biden won't be sitting in the oval office with an audience to work off of.

So from everything AOC says, all that seems reasonable to me is (1) the observation that there is no good Democratic alternative plan, (2) the worry that the convention might run long so the alternative candidate can't appear on the ticket, (3) the possibility that a succesful Republican coup is significantly more likely with a candidate that might provide loopholes for the Supreme Court to work off of than with Biden, and (4) the possibility of losing Ohio if Biden would otherwise have won it.

However, even here, the parts of the alternative plan she is most worried about seems to be the legal trouble, which she seems most worried about only if the Democrats aren't on time with selecting a candidate. It seems to me that if only the Democrats are able to rally behind a new candidate before the Ohio deadline two days before the convention, none of her concerns apply more to the new candidate than to Biden. If it happens after the Ohio deadline, it only matters if there is a technicality that disqualifies the new candidate and Biden would otherwise have won Ohio and that technicality determines whether a coup succesfully occurs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 27 points 5 months ago (6 children)

If Biden can't make the case for his cognitive ability to fulfill the requirements of the office internally to his own party, how does he expect to stand up and fight the shit storm that the GOP will escalate in the coming months?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Are people here finally understanding the consequences of removing Biden? Will I continue to be berated for asking for evidence of the claims around him?

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

If Biden is on the ballot, I will vote for him. I also want him off.

But, frankly, we need to scare the pants off the Democratic party if there is going to be any chance they change their behavior.

Where are the five great younger candidates they have have been fostering to be ready for something like this? Nowhere, because they keep putting all their effort into one entrenched candidate and then force them through no matter what. Look how disastrous it was when they kept pushing Hillary when Bernie was doing so well, she lost. Now so many people are saying "no" to Biden, what should we expect will happen?

If history is our judge, we're going to lose, whether we can afford to or not. Because even if we supported Biden right now with solidarity, a lot of people are going to not vote for him, whether we like it or not.

Would it be better if the Democratic party didn't see how unhappy people were and we all pretended it would be ok and told them we would just vote for any candidate they give us no matter how bad?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (12 children)

IMO; Biden shouldn’t be forced out.

That way does lead to chaos, and a worse chance in November than with Biden.

Though Biden sucks as a candidate and is very unlikely to win as things now stand.

So, imo, best-case, is Biden choosing to step down. and choosing to stump and campaign full-hog whoever does become president.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

No shit. The time for not backing Biden was in the last primary. If the Democrats weren't so fucking short sighted and power hungry, they would have had a primary all of last year instead of now having to back this geriatric horse against a geriatric, racist, fascist, horse in this race.

That said, I'll be voting for the geriatric horse because the alternative will end up getting my minority ass killed.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden just stepped down for elections

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›