What a lousy article, you can't know if it's the proposition talked by the important people or some nutjobs from Baltics like usual in case of such idiocy, or maybe it's just a journo duck.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

At least a lot of Swedish parties had an anti-China message for the EU election. Those parties are also very anti-infrastructure, so idunno, maybe?

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

tfw "rules-based international order" means we're allowed to break those rules whenever we want but our enemies aren't allowed to do the same

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

They were missing some punctuation when the made that statement it should actually read “rules-based? International order!”

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

China never would have allowed these transfers to begin with. And if they did happen they would have been reversed with no recourse to the foreign investor. China has actually screwed foreign investors in a million different ways without any real response from the west.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

Good, we should take notes.