this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
49 points (87.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

33 readers
1 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Warner Bros. Japan apologizes after the U.S. Twitter account for the movie promotes posts that appear to make light of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kibiz0r@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is one of the reasons it’s so weird and toxic to have brands posting on social media as if they were just “fellow users”.

If a random user posts some Barbenheimer content, I can grant that person the dignity of being a full human who probably has complex, conflicting feelings about the Manhattan Project, and some kind of ironic detachment yet fascination with the existence of the Barbie movie.

If WB posts (or comments on) it, there’s really no room for nuance. They want engagement, they want money. If there is (or was) irony or self-criticism embedded in the content, that fact is only incidental.

So then WB gets rightfully scorned for casually dismissing war crimes to get more attention to their properties.

But where does that leave the rest of us?

Cuz the implication is that individuals shouldn’t be posting Barbenheimer stuff, either… but that doesn’t feel right.

There’s something culturally meaningful to this meme, that we probably shouldn’t quash — but it also shouldn’t be crudely leveraged for profit.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of the backlash cited in the article seems out of touch, this in particular:

User @akishmz tweeted: “Summer to remember that to the Barbie film team and to Hollywood more than 200,000 death by the end of 1945 (and half a million so far) by two atrocious bombs are something they feel comfortable joking about to promote their precious summer blockbuster.”

I must have missed the part where these memes are making jokes about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[–] THED4NIEL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I must have missed the part where these memes are making jokes about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Simple: It doesn't.

Barbenheimer, also known as Barbie Heimer, is a portmanteau of the words "Barbie" and "Oppenheimer" in reference to the 2023 movies Barbie and Oppenheimer, which were released on the same date (July 21st, 2023), causing a slew of Barbie vs. Oppenheimer memes that humorously combined the contrasting aesthetics and themes of both films. In turn, the word "Barbenheimer" spawned on social media and gained its own traction in memes and viral discourse, mostly in reference to the act of doing a double feature of both films. Many Barbenheimer memes and fan art used images that were both pink and black (correlating with the color palettes of both films), as well as images that involved both explosions and girly aesthetics.

It's just a typical case of taking a thing and getting riled up about it, without making a simple Google search, what the thing you don't like is even about.

Seeing they made 9/11 memes to retaliate against Americans already, why not keep barbenheimer? Tea is already spilled on both ends, everybody is unhappy, that's a compromise for ya

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Very well said.

[–] LZamperini@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I give them permission to make one 9/11 joke.

[–] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My apology on this matter is scheduled for the same press conference where Japan apologizes for what Imperial Japan did.

[–] zzmthesurand@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They’re in it too deep now. It’d be weird to suddenly apologize for events that happened 80 years ago, even though they should.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Didn't the Dutch royal family recently apologize for the horrible shit they did in Africa?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

They'd have to also apologize for denying it for 80 years at this point

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I feel like the United States is frequently in the same position on many issues.

We have acknowledged big ones like slavery, but for all of those there are many others.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Apparently they already did; the article doesn't include an image but in my imagination it's hilarious.

Twitter user @mankodaisuki58 replied to the apology with a picture of Barbie sitting on the shoulders of Osama Bin Laden in front of burning buildings in the same style as one of the original posts. It is captioned “visiting the places from movie scenes” in Japanese and “It’s going to be a summer to remember” in English.

[–] MicTEST@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's ... peculiar to me that Japan doesn't think they need to teach the history of or ackowledge the war crimes they enacted on the Chinese, Koreans, etc.

But how dare Americans make a movie about the doom of nuclear war.

[–] THED4NIEL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The massacre on Nanking was a dire read

[–] Danobc@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

One wrong doesn't make the other right.

I kinda felt the same way, I went to see it with some friends and as a joke they wore some beachwear. It felt tasteless but I didn't want to sour the mood by commenting on it

[–] jeanma@lemmy.ninja -2 points 1 year ago

I am not japanese BUT I am pissed off by this such shitty, forced fun joke that you have to follow to show you are IN. A TheVerge level joke from weak, white guys and gals.

"OK Boomer" "Ice bucket challenge" and so many dumb, silly trend.

[–] PabloPicasshole@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

They’re just sore losers.

[–] emptyother@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Understandable really.

I do miss the time we could joke about something in a faraway land, and by the time it reached them many months later by word of mouth it would have mutated into something more culturally acceptable. We should never have invented the printing press.

[–] kibiz0r@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Are you immortal?

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

punching down is never funny

[–] emptyother@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Punching down? It was intended to be a relatively tame joke about the world have been small for quite a while, and pre-emptively make light of those who would think this "being too easily offended" is a relatively new thing. Im sorry if I failed to communicate this correctly.