politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
For who?
Harris. Obviously. That's how the line of succession works.
Fuck that
Hear that, everybody? PythagreousTitties isn't on board with the VP of the sick and confused 81-year-old president being president. It's kinda the biggest aspect of the entire point of the office of VP, but PythagreousTitties says no, sooooo 🤷♂️
No explanation, no nuance, just "fuck that" so let's just pack it up and cross our fingers, I guess.
I'm not so sure they are an automatic shoo-in for running in the general? Maybe by convention or norms or something, but....is she the best candidate to beat donnie?
Too late to find the best candidate, that would be settled in a primary. Kamila is marginally better than Biden, and has the war chest they've fundraised. At best we get an exciting new VP
This thread isn't about that. The original comment in this post was about the 25th amendment and the first reply was asking who would replace him. The line of succession is crystal clear that the VP is acting president when the president cannot discharge duties.
Who runs if Biden drops out is a different and important question, and while I don't have a great and confident answer, there's absolutely no reason why Harris wouldn't be a good pick when we already decided she'd be fine when we voted for her to be plan b behind Biden's 77/78 year old body, so idk why that should necessarily change right now. It's like we agreed that she should be president if/when Biden couldn't do it anymore, and now we're saying he can't do it anymore, but maybe now she shouldn't be the backup plan we already decided that she should be?
Oh, fair enough. Yeah, if he is given the Amendment 25 treatment, then sure. I don't think it works any other way.
👍
Harris polls worse than Biden by quite a bit.
A) I'm talking about who is next in line of succession, not the nomination. If Biden's cabinet declares him unfit for office, Harris will become the President, but she doesn't have to be the nominee. B) Actually, she doesn't. Her approval is in a statistical tie with Biden's, while her disapproval is much lower. I'm not saying she's the best option (her numbers are about the same or worse than a lot of other potential candidates), but pretty much everyone's polls are looking a little better than Biden's now, and his are still going down.