this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
203 points (98.1% liked)

movies

1746 readers
294 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
maegul@lemmy.ml
Blaze@lemm.ee
UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
orangeNgreen@lemmy.world
neidu2@feddit.nl
Emperor@feddit.uk
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
maegul@lemm.ee
203
Alec Baldwin's manslaughter trial over Rust shooting has been dismissed (www.joblo.com)
submitted 4 months ago by UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk to c/movies@lemm.ee
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The manslaughter trial against Alec Baldwin over the fatal shooting of Rust cinematographer Halyna Hutchins has been dismissed. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer threw out the case over how police and prosecutors treated a handful of bullets, which they failed to turn over to the defence.

“The state is highly culpable for its failure to provide discovery to the defendant,” Judge Sommer said. “Dismissal with prejudice is warranted.” The dismissal came as a surprise as gasps were said to be heard in the courtroom and Baldwin was congratulated by his family and supporters.

More to come…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Do you think that was intentional? Like was the prosecution paid off?

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It looks like the armorer was a local and her dad’s cop buddies hid evidence to try to help her. At least one prosecutor signed off on it, because she testified that she didn’t turn over the evidence because she thought it was irrelevant.

There is no universe where live ammunition recovered from the scene is irrelevant.

[–] dtaylor84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Uh, they weren't recovered from the scene.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The official law enforcement reports were falsified. We don’t know where the bullets they lied about came from. If the police deliberately lied on an official report once, why would you trust the rest of the “official” report?

Courts give law enforcement a lot of blind trust. If you can prove that this trust has been violated, everything they’ve done under that umbrella of trust comes into question.

If it’s this egregious and the prosecutor (s) were okay with it, we don’t even get to have a trial. Why would a fake investigation result in a trial?

The tragedy for the victims is that they’ll never truly know what happened, because the people entrusted with handling the investigation cared more about protecting their own and prosecuting a “Hollywood liberal” than finding out what really happened.

[–] koberulz@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

You think prosecutors need to be paid off to hide evidence and generally ignore the rights of defendants?