this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
657 points (98.4% liked)

Reddit

17641 readers
354 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This comment was in a post about a guy who openly spilled secrets then got fired.

https://www.reddit.com/r/golf/comments/1dynric/rip_to_the_augusta_ama_guy_yesterday_who_was_not/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Because there is no discernable difference between you telling an honest story about your Turkish coworkers and a racist using online anonymity to rile people up against minorities.

[–] JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I think that should be decided by the readers of the comment not by reddit. Unless I actually incite hate or violence. Or maybe if I had a history of leaving comments like that. But it was the first time I talked about it. Or if my account was new or a bot. I don't like to assume the worst about people just because they criticise something adjacent to a controversial topic. That's how problems get swept under the rug and never solved.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Except if you leave it solely to the readers of the comment, the communications platform is still flooded by racists and bigots of all stripes. Sure, a lot of their comments are downvoted, but by giving them a platform you're giving them a way to degrade the quality of the platform they're on, drive away reasonable users and eventually take over and shit up the place unrestricted. Just like the nazi bar story.

Downvotes are nowhere near as effective as moderation when it comes to keeping hate off of a platform. Sorry if you posted something in good faith and moderation censored you, but that doesn't make moderation as a concept wrong.

(Also, I kind of agree with you that there should be more signals available to moderators than just "does this comment mention race negatively". However, I'm not sure you want reddit scoring what kind of person you are and attaching that score to every moderation action.)

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes and FURTHERMORE, POE'S LAW EXISTS

and it's NOT actually "just" about parody - it's all too often impossible to tell honest anecdote apart from ideological rhetoric.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 2 points 4 months ago

Poe's law doesn't mean ban anything that's edging a bit close to what you think it is. It's like arresting people for a crime they didn't commit but because they act suspiciously according to the eye of the authority.

[–] JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

How would you solve problems pertaining to immigration when you can't talk about experiences. There is actually a large problem of parallel societies in germany that has been rampant for decades because no one wants to talk about it. I mean like people doing what I talked about in my comments or not learning the countrys language in decades and having no contact to native germans. I my comment I was actually talking about people who were born here and their familys lived here for generations. In western europe in general it's driving people to the extreme right, because no one dares talk about it in a normal and legitimate way. Censorship only makes these problems worse. There needs to be a way to talk about this topic with some nuance, not just blatant hate rhetoric.

[–] JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I don't think Moderation as a concept is wrong. I also filed an appeal, so i'll see what they say after taking a closer look. But I sense a huge problem of people not being able to understand any nuances in this topic. So they just leave the whole thing for the extreme right as their talking point.

[–] Tregetour@lemdro.id 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The nazi bar story is retarded. To buy into it is to forfeit all your advantages against the obnoxious minority, such as being vastly greater in number, and being able to exercise critical thinking abilities. The nazi doesn't drive anyone away, people make the choice to do so themselves, when in fact they should challenge and confront at every opportunity. All the idea does is empower bad actors and agents provocateur and deny the agency of individuals. To borrow from Nicholas Taleb: it's a very fragile concept.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Thank you for being reasonable and understanding how life isn’t black and white.

gets banned for using black and white

[–] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Well not if you strip it from all context and the nuance of OPs specific word choice.

Because I could tell a story about my Turkish co-worker that ends like:

"my co-worker of specific race is doing dodgy shit and it's so harmful for the whole community that he's doing this, especially with how much anti-ethnic group hate is going around, he's giving everyone a bad name and I'm worried his behaviour as an individual aashole who happens to be race is going to start a spree of hate crimes against others who aren't doing anything wrong, because most people aren't, my co-worker is"

And I would argue that this story is fundamentally different from just leaving it as "my Turkish co-worker is doing dodgy stuff".