this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)

Degrowth

782 readers
1 users here now

Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Degrowth as a community topic has somewhat of a problem, in that it is rather limited. Posting about the need to shrink the economy smartly becomes repetitive over time. So I tried to increase the scope of the community a bit by allowing other related topics like UBI, housing cooperatives, worker owned companies and so forth. However I do understand that this might be controversial. So I have a few question to the people intressted in this commuity:

  • Is increasing the scope of the community a good idea?

  • What topics should be offtopic in this community? As in do we allow say discussions about renewable energy, carbon markets and maybe even green stocks. Right now I see a bunch of China economy posts. Are those reasonable?

  • Should I rename the community to reflect a wider scope of discussion? If so what name would be good?

  • How can we make the community more intressting in general? Say topic of the week, more memes or whatever.

  • Where should the moderation line be? No swearing or going for even implied insults.

I would love to get some good feedback and suggestions. Thanks for them in advance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MalReynolds 5 points 4 months ago

Nice that you're actively moderating in the democratic fashion.

Personally:

Scope will increase if you moderate well, and in this case because (IMO) there's a historical imperative (or we all gonna die)

Worry about offtopic when there's enough, it'll likely become apparent.

Just own Degrowth (sans modifiers, i.e. no Economics as if people mattered)

Keep posting, it'll happen (also rss feed filtering on degrowth may help)

Eh, nazis bad, swearing at nazis OK (IMO). You need a larger sample size...