this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
1121 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

1435 readers
95 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
themaninblack@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Mastengwe@lemm.ee
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513
ogmios@sh.itjust.works
1121
Fuck up a book for me please (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by SwordInStone@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
527 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A woman often cooks various meals for a man, but he consistently rejects her efforts despite her persistence, even when she's physically struggling. Still, she remains safe.

Brought to you by ChatGPT 4.0

[–] debil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's actually not that bad. Of course missing all the smells and taste of the text, allusions and double meanings, but as a very coarse synopsis it'll do.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Oh it did give a longer response initially, then I asked to reduce the sentence to its essence, just like the ad from this post did. The longer version was:

A woman occasionally prepares a meal for a man, including a variety of foods and drinks, potentially exotic or unusual. Despite her efforts and the variety she provides, the man often dismisses the meals disdainfully. Even when she's struggling physically (with shaking joints), she keeps trying to please him with her cooking. But no matter how hard she tries, he often rejects her efforts, treating her with scorn. Despite his harsh treatment, the woman remains safe.

[–] debil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. I'd definitely skim through such a version, albeit it totally abolishes the intricacies of FW.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yep, but it opens it up to a broader audience. Even though that's probably exactly the opposite of what he intended.

[–] debil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Many parts of FW work a bit like an abstract painting where each viewer finds their own interpretation, each of those equally valid and independent of what the author possibly intended. An AI dumbed down version would just show one path through the work, the one it thinks is the main road. But yes, at best, such version could sparkle an interest and function as a gateway to the work. Or extinguish all interest for good.