this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
346 points (96.3% liked)

World News

32286 readers
844 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world 163 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The cruise line is concerned about sustainability. That's rich.

[–] vd1n@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole idea of the article is pr marketing by the cruise ship, lol.

[–] Pips@lemmy.film 6 points 1 year ago

Their comments are PR mitigation. Pulling up to the whale butchering was definitely not a PR stunt.

[–] maporita@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

The cruise line is concerned about upsetting their passengers, that is all.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Sustainability of the things that entertain their passengers so the cruise line can continue to make more money.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, it is rich. Rich people pretending to be responsible.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cruises aren't that expensive. But your point stands.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on the cruise. There are some really expensive cruise lines out there.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, I'm just saying that just because it's a cruise line doesn't mean the passengers are rich. It can cost <$1k or so for a weeklong cruise, which is cheaper than a lot of vacations.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

$1k USD is over a year's wages for someone at the global poverty line.

Just because it's cheaper than other more expensive alternatives doesn't mean it's not expensive and extravagant. It's also a lot more polluting than some of your more expensive vacations you could compare it to; so in reality, it's not actually cheaper, it just externalizes some of the costs on to the environment (or, the rest of humanity).

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but if we're comparing against the global population, anything more than a picnic at a place within walking distance could be considered extravagant. I'm close with a lot of people for whom an air-conditioned bus ride to the nearest major city once/year is out of reach (something like $20/person). I understand that poverty exists, and I have lived among those experiencing it.

The context he is that these are likely average people, not wealthy people, relative to the country they come from. You're not likely to find millionaires and certainly not billionaires on a cruise. Wealthier people tend to prefer to escape large groups of people (i.e. they'll have a cabin or something somewhere), not get stuck on a massive ship with hundreds or thousands of other people.

The passengers on the cruise ship aren't your enemies, the owners of the cruise lines and the international community that gives them massive exceptions to the rules are the ones to blame. Cruises can absolutely be much more efficient, but they're not because the people in charge let them pollute and any fines for abuse of what few laws exist tend to be merely a slap on the wrist.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

More like pretending they aren’t responsible.